Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-mesos-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-mesos-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 644EF18E5F for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:21:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66884 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2015 22:21:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-mesos-issues-archive@mesos.apache.org Received: (qmail 66847 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2015 22:21:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@mesos.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@mesos.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@mesos.apache.org Received: (qmail 66837 invoked by uid 99); 4 Aug 2015 22:21:05 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 22:21:05 +0000 Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:21:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Yan Xu (JIRA)" To: issues@mesos.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Comment Edited] (MESOS-2847) User can specify image provisioners and provisioning backends MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14654458#comment-14654458 ] Yan Xu edited comment on MESOS-2847 at 8/4/15 10:20 PM: -------------------------------------------------------- [~tnachen] There is already {{\-\-provisioners}} and for AppC the code in review has {{\-\-appc_backend}}. In a unified scenario the backend can be specified via {{\-\-provisioner_backend}} and we need to figure out compatibility between the two flags. It looks like in most cases whatever backend AppC can use should also be Docker compatible. Is this what the ticket is intended to track? was (Author: xujyan): [~tnachen] There is already {{--provisioners}} and for AppC the code in review has {{--appc_backend}}. In a unified scenario the backend can be specified via {{--provisioner_backend}} and we need to figure out compatibility between the two flags. It looks like in most cases whatever backend AppC can use should also be Docker compatible. Is this what the ticket is intended to track? > User can specify image provisioners and provisioning backends > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: MESOS-2847 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2847 > Project: Mesos > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: containerization > Reporter: Timothy Chen > Assignee: Ian Downes > Labels: unified-prototype > > Support new flags so users can pass in provisioners and backends -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)