Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356D4200C62 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 01:52:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 34276160BA3; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 7ABDF160B9E for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 01:52:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 42714 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2017 23:52:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@mesos.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@mesos.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@mesos.apache.org Received: (qmail 42702 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2017 23:52:41 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:52:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BB1FF1A0742 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:52:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.379 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XpyCcAxhhNin for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:52:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yb0-f169.google.com (mail-yb0-f169.google.com [209.85.213.169]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 7E8AC5FC6F for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:52:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id f204so3087891ybc.2 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:52:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=21RUfKSwrFlmP7HzIBuEpfn27lD4GLHAUTYtUJlJ/tg=; b=auPK69TAsTEa8LKn1rSVsdyN9KM73tdqoYMoc9xxavcJGvpv0j4pm2pVQH0/Amx5ji irdN1hv3ckSbx4OuFnhGz2H4V3KXh4GVrrik/VnX6b7ZR5JkawUkTqBfNwaCHtfHX68K LQodIf0XvtaEmEkL9idtyMNeoqi9n0z2/BTmq101lmuR/b3zm2VgWGBU5msqHU2doxLv Na0xLVVnvK/6jITJ9kLMuwWD9CoDZi/oQNdZQWhM6Exq+y/IANTaUd77ZbJUZCdoiqeZ MA/oXRnr09bnnYdhYjHNfdlctDRdQ9RCjnVYuSMKv1Wtg/jFqMc+wefo7XYB+EqEJ6xv BVTg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=21RUfKSwrFlmP7HzIBuEpfn27lD4GLHAUTYtUJlJ/tg=; b=rQD7JJzRFwF86O5V2JzOwX0OIzRUGEtDe6S9RtbBryHvjtsXGvBYWUSFnuo/+eadmM 9xwGkpLwENgai8CKmHZqlnGkEWE7gp9G9DpOZj0mW+2aGPR+H8OzPVFW++NfY+MoLXCF xbczQmxPZqZHkD6eHV70oxICZ5MIKW75h1C9uaov2ZR0+OCJIg16tjdzfquGIAWFNekR 4GSGyo/psLcF/IYKYIsctADJSmNMFjDR0YIVXzbZIlnLrrFufaBOQxSX4IgrtoMqKlax LZGsj7uSE6urN73hSzVMCMQce4MIRzaeRKlbYVU/zeW9Q7tauxECMnUw8IcYVuAXd/l0 RhGg== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6UhOjjUr2dihCyNwJqZ+KmeFGYvSrbETgJYTsRA7yZzicW/wa7Cot3gn3GZizwtQ== X-Received: by 10.37.34.8 with SMTP id i8mr3683451ybi.33.1491954753655; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yb0-f173.google.com (mail-yb0-f173.google.com. [209.85.213.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f128sm8057620ywf.25.2017.04.11.16.52.33 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id i124so3079004ybc.3 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:52:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.37.217.13 with SMTP id q13mr13166319ybg.166.1491954752940; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:52:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.217.144 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:52:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jie Yu Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:52:32 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: 1.0.4 release To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114fd7cc124eb3054cecc976 archived-at: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:52:43 -0000 --001a114fd7cc124eb3054cecc976 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Also, looks like 1.0.3 is still showing "unreleased" in JIRA. On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Jie Yu wrote: > Thanks Vinod. This sounds good. > > I don't see any additional patch on top of 1.0.3, at least in the > changelog. Can you make sure to update the changelog for that? (or you > forgot to update the master changelog?) > > - Jie > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Vinod Kone wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> Though, we are technically past the 6 month support period for the 1.0.x >> series, there were some commits that were cherry-picked onto the 1.0.x >> branch after 1.0.3 was released. So, I'm willing to do a 1.0.4 patch >> release which will be the last patch release for 1.0. >> >> I plan to cut an RC later this week, so if you have things that must >> absolutely go to the technically unsupported 1.0.x branch, please cherry >> pick them ASAP. If you are still on 1.0.x, please upgrade to 1.1.x or >> 1.2.x >> which are still officially supported. >> >> Thanks, >> Vinod >> >> P.S: I'm planning to delete the 1.0.x branch after 1.0.4 release to >> strongly signal the EOL for 1.0.x and to avoid committers mistakenly >> backporting fixes to 1.0.x. Any objections? >> > > --001a114fd7cc124eb3054cecc976--