Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4797200C3F for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 22:00:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B30D0160B94; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:00:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 02187160B74 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 22:00:35 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 81838 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2017 21:00:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@mesos.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@mesos.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@mesos.apache.org Received: (qmail 81826 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2017 21:00:34 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:00:34 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 27F341A0527 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:00:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.679 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C9b27He4opL6 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:00:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f53.google.com (mail-it0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 881F15FCD3 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:00:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f53.google.com with SMTP id y18so30216216itc.0 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:00:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rvCFOdRppPrnIBZmaegZ+Zy5sb8Ruds5Ia0Ly/d/3WM=; b=E9U44P5fkV2oDcmPyTRLsWnmIR0XNKUNNnb8coTsvPSTMzlOYLL8Z8eUP4WVwI5OPq t2mcs0EYKCUZcFO2EFAQr8XgoshqkiJ9oaHmHUtX0fEkumwAqz5YycANHL8JBZj/MMx2 XRQ/bAwiz7vQiyiLwHdp3irAFf1RKMP4lWkpB0JxkUOo7LgG09xcfJI9DbBbwlSRS2iK fZk9Q8+6wnN1M+4bJM7+L7HYdzMcKYfNY1S49e32NXgOIx68373R+5jAI5ndwk5pbloZ 8f6iFocpJvsNsnK400cEGFGm9+H/ftSY/t+LZe5hX3PBOfLgHHp7i2fsFcGl+6bB+0v0 RBrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=rvCFOdRppPrnIBZmaegZ+Zy5sb8Ruds5Ia0Ly/d/3WM=; b=sk8bI1p+NJVezCi80PjwrDYpvF/ShFzJsZHU1ak9ZkPM4Th4KdEhzmZpA1Et3eUVl4 H31JU8PeBSvVToON/gpiT7pURX2z6SOLAzwB9c7AOOtC/SdXQ2dVwq0IuuOPzbuoTP37 YEe7NUizqoThGk4/nhHe/9T9M+KdaTJrXyARNwsJROpqbs2JLMCU8rQuoiAma5yRrbVq +sq9dus1rj7NVTGXcaAmKp7Abbji9lYKQM4GnWmo54A50KDHTte/duTVffwkWLuAegyW RVbrofTA0x7qHsRw/Hdu0t8EVqW+CWx7lgL9YovZ4JAiJgZJeBr0TYfvDzdpIG24Qvui wzTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3X3m5hlISmJwl2HvlFptwBn3A2smZw1cKEB5gPO7sG6WmFHLncGIHZDv/Rt2F+/w== X-Received: by 10.36.146.134 with SMTP id l128mr9986836itd.19.1490216431086; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com (mail-io0-f176.google.com. [209.85.223.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c100sm659163itd.20.2017.03.22.14.00.30 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io0-f176.google.com with SMTP id l7so71701004ioe.3 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:00:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.107.47.130 with SMTP id v2mr36321848iov.201.1490216429140; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:00:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.36.55.78 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:00:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jie Yu Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:00:28 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Container Storage Interface (CSI) To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c16b40e5d4c4054b580c9b archived-at: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:00:36 -0000 --001a11c16b40e5d4c4054b580c9b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Dave, This is the public doc we shared with storage vendors and boarder community. We also have an internal doc with all the comments the revision history. That doc hasn't been opened yet. We're still working on it. The public doc is a copy of the original doc a week ago. We did that so that we can better manage comments from container orchestrators vs. comments from storage vendors. Me and Saad (from Google) are the author of this doc. But all the people part of that working group participated in the discussion. - Jie On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Dave Lester wrote: > Hi Jie, > > Who are the original author(s) of this document? Normally spec work > attributes authors, and I don't see that here -- revision history on the > doc is also turned off. > > Dave > > On 2017-03-22 12:02 (-0700), Jie Yu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Container Storage Interface (CSI) > > is a joint work > between > > container orchestrators (Mesos, Kubernetes, Docker and Cloud Foundry) > > trying to standardize the interface between container orchestrator and > > storage platforms. > > > > The goal is to let storage platforms just write one plugin that works for > > all container orchestrators. > > > > The initial discussion is captured in this doc: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JMNVNP-ZHz8cGlnqckOnpJmHF-DNY7IYP- > > Di7iuVhQI/edit?usp=sharing > > > > Feel free to comment on that doc if you have any thoughts! This is the > same > > doc shared in the k8s and Docker community. > > > > The relevant Mesos work to integrate CSI is captured in the Resource > > Provider design doc: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/125YWqg_ > 5BB5OY9a6M7LZcby5RSqBwo2PZzpVL > > uxYXh4/edit?usp=sharing > > > > - Jie > > > --001a11c16b40e5d4c4054b580c9b--