mesos-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Clemmer <clemmer.alexan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Community Sync Interval
Date Mon, 19 Oct 2015 01:32:18 GMT
(Sorry, just out of ignorance: is anyone allowed to come to the
community sync? I googled around and it looks like the answer is yes,
but I don't see a living schedule anywhere... If the answer is indeed
yes, is there a form where I can sign up for the calendar invite?)

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Christopher M Luciano
<cmluciano@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> +1 weekly
>
>  On Oct 16, 2015, 12:38:31 PM, "Marco Massenzio" <marco@mesosphere.io> wrote:
>  Just to clarify, I'd been assuming rotating times when I gave my +1 for
>  bi-weekly.
>  Having said that, I don't feel too strongly about it - the positive thing
>  about weekly meetings is that we can skip one every other for those who
>  "like it bi-weekly" :) (the other way, instead, not being possible!)
>  Thanks!
>  --
>  *Marco Massenzio*
>  Distributed Systems Engineer
>  http://codetrips.com
>  On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Diana J Arroyo  wrote:
>  > +1 for weekly.
>  >
>  > Best Regards,
>  > Diana Arroyo
>  > darroyo@us.ibm.com
>  >
>  > [image: Inactive hide details for tommy xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13
>  > AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske > xiao ---10/16/2015
07:20:13 AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36
>  > GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske :
>  >
>  > From: tommy xiao
>  > To: dev@mesos.apache.org
>  > Date: 10/16/2015 07:20 AM
>  > Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval
>  > ------------------------------
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > +1 for bi-weekly.
>  >
>  > 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske :
>  >
>  > > +1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the first
>  > > place, as I suspect many others as well.
>  > >
>  > > (9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am and
>  > 5pm
>  > > or something like that.)
>  > >
>  > > > On Oct 16, 2015, at 11:08 AM, haosdent  wrote:
>  > > >
>  > > > If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and 9pm(Pacific)
>  > OK
>  > > > for UTC+8.
>  > > >
>  > > > +1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host places?
>  > > >
>  > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon
>  > > wrote:
>  > > >
>  > > >> Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the times
>  > to
>  > > >> better accommodate people in different time zones. This could mean
>  > > >> something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of these
a
>  > > week,
>  > > >> then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west
>  > coast
>  > > >> that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can still
>  > > include
>  > > >> Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to attend
at
>  > > >> least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer present.
>  > > >> Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave weekly
>  > > >> meetings have a chance.
>  > > >>
>  > > >> +1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can get
it on
>  > > the
>  > > >> calendar!
>  > > >>
>  > > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma  wrote:
>  > > >>
>  > > >>> +1 for weekly
>  > > >>>
>  > > >>> Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress
step by
>  > > >> step
>  > > >>>
>  > > >>>
>  > > >>> On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote:
>  > > >>>
>  > > >>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>> Regards!
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>> Yong Qiao Wang(王勇桥)
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>> From:   Jojy Varghese
>  > > >>>> To:     dev@mesos.apache.org
>  > > >>>> Date:   16/10/2015 09:01
>  > > >>>> Subject:        Re: Community Sync Interval
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>> +1 bi-weekly
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>> On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez
>  > > >>>>>
>  > > >>>>  wrote:
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
>  > > >>>>>
>  > > >>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov <
>  > alex@mesosphere.com
>  > > >
>  > > >>>>>
>  > > >>>> wrote:
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
>  > > >>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg
>  > > >>>>>>
>  > > >>>>> > > >>>>
>  > > >>>>> wrote:
>  > > >>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>> +1 Weekly
>  > > >>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>> -Elizabeth
>  > > >>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann
>  > > wrote:
>  > > >>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can
re-evaluate in a
>  > bit
>  > > to
>  > > >>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>> see
>  > > >>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>> how people are liking it.
>  > > >>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya
Liu <
>  > gyliu513@gmail.com
>  > > >>>>>>>> > wrote:
>  > > >>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
>  > > >>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>  > > >>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>> Guangya
>  > > >>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel
Mercer <
>  > > >>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>> dmercer@fantoccini.com
>  > > >>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>> >
>  > > >>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>  > > >>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing
returns we can
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>> always
>  > > >>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>> reset
>  > > >>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>> to biweekly.
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM,
Kapil Arya <
>  > > kapil@mesosphere.io
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>  > > >>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40
PM, Jan Schlicht <
>  > > jan@mesosphere.io
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>> >
>  > > >>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>  > > >>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly.
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36
PM, Artem Harutyunyan <
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>> artem@mesosphere.io >
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly.
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015
at 10:41 AM, haosdent <
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>> haosdent@gmail.com
>  > > >>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>> >
>  > > >>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015
at 1:19 AM, Michael Park <
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mcypark@gmail.com
>  > > >>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We discussed whether
the community syncs should be weekly
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>  > > >>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>> bi-weekly
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (once every 2 weeks).
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were differing
opinions on the subject during the
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> community
>  > > >>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>> sync
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>> today.
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for
weekly: meetings can be shorter and
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> missing
>  > > >>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>> a
>  > > >>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>> meeting
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be as big a deal
as missing a longer meeting.
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for
bi-weekly: there are many people involved
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>  > > >>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>> these
>  > > >>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>> meetings, we should keep it infrequent
so that it reduces
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's
>  > > >>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>> time
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> commitments.
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is
intended to capture your +1s or other ideas
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>  > > >>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>> might
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>> have!
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MPark.
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haosdent Huang
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>> --
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Jan Schlicht*
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Distributed Systems Engineer,
Mesosphere
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>> --
>  > > >>> Da (Klaus), Ma (马达) | PMP® | Advisory Software Engineer
>  > > >>> Platform Symphony/DCOS Development & Support, STG, IBM GCG
>  > > >>> +86-10-8245 4084 | madaxa@cn.ibm.com | http://www.cguru.net
>  > > >>>
>  > > >>>
>  > > >>
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > > --
>  > > > Best Regards,
>  > > > Haosdent Huang
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > Deshi Xiao
>  > Twitter: xds2000
>  > E-mail: xiaods(AT)gmail.com
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >



-- 
Alex

Theory is the first term in the Taylor series of practice. -- Thomas M
Cover (1992)

Mime
View raw message