mesos-dev mailing list archives: February 2015

Site index · List index
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Re: Proposing Apache Mesos stand at FOSDEM 2015
Nils De Moor   Re: Proposing Apache Mesos stand at FOSDEM 2015 Fri, 30 Jan, 09:28
Re: Review Request 28763: Add configure flag to enable SSL.
Benjamin Hindman   Re: Review Request 28763: Add configure flag to enable SSL. Sun, 01 Feb, 00:35
Niklas Nielsen   Re: Review Request 28763: Add configure flag to enable SSL. Tue, 17 Feb, 02:10
Joris Van Remoortere     Re: Review Request 28763: Add configure flag to enable SSL. Tue, 17 Feb, 19:48
Michael Park Shadowing variable names Sun, 01 Feb, 02:48
Alex Rukletsov   Re: Shadowing variable names Mon, 02 Feb, 10:19
Dominic Hamon     Re: Shadowing variable names Mon, 02 Feb, 17:45
Re: Review Request 30395: etcd master contender + detector
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 30395: etcd master contender + detector Mon, 02 Feb, 10:27
Re: Review Request 29890: Refactored allocator interface to support general implementations.
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 29890: Refactored allocator interface to support general implementations. Mon, 02 Feb, 13:31
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 29890: Refactored allocator interface to support general implementations. Wed, 04 Feb, 16:47
Alexander Rukletsov     Re: Review Request 29890: Refactored allocator interface to support general implementations. Tue, 10 Feb, 19:59
Vinod Kone       Re: Review Request 29890: Refactored allocator interface to support general implementations. Wed, 11 Feb, 19:12
Alexander Rukletsov       Re: Review Request 29890: Refactored allocator interface to support general implementations. Thu, 12 Feb, 19:39
Vinod Kone   Re: Review Request 29890: Refactored allocator interface to support general implementations. Thu, 05 Feb, 18:55
Re: Review Request 30218: Add version() to docker abstraction.
Bernd Mathiske   Re: Review Request 30218: Add version() to docker abstraction. Mon, 02 Feb, 17:15
Timothy Chen     Re: Review Request 30218: Add version() to docker abstraction. Thu, 19 Feb, 18:38
Re: Review Request 30459: Refactored task/offer/resource valiation in master.
Jie Yu   Re: Review Request 30459: Refactored task/offer/resource valiation in master. Mon, 02 Feb, 17:28
Ben Mahler   Re: Review Request 30459: Refactored task/offer/resource valiation in master. Tue, 03 Feb, 01:35
Jie Yu   Re: Review Request 30459: Refactored task/offer/resource valiation in master. Tue, 03 Feb, 18:28
Re: Review Request 30442: Update mesos for query string encode/decode
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 30442: Update mesos for query string encode/decode Mon, 02 Feb, 18:29
Jie Yu Review Request 30508: Prepare persistent volumes in slave. Mon, 02 Feb, 18:29
Jie Yu   Re: Review Request 30508: Prepare persistent volumes in slave. Mon, 02 Feb, 18:37
Mesos ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 30508: Prepare persistent volumes in slave. Mon, 02 Feb, 21:03
Jie Yu     Re: Review Request 30508: Prepare persistent volumes in slave. Mon, 09 Feb, 18:00
Mesos ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 30508: Prepare persistent volumes in slave. Mon, 09 Feb, 18:04
Vinod Kone       Re: Review Request 30508: Prepare persistent volumes in slave. Mon, 09 Feb, 20:12
Jie Yu         Re: Review Request 30508: Prepare persistent volumes in slave. Mon, 09 Feb, 22:37
Jie Yu       Re: Review Request 30508: Prepare persistent volumes in slave. Mon, 09 Feb, 22:37
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 30508: Prepare persistent volumes in slave. Mon, 09 Feb, 22:56
Vinod Kone         Re: Review Request 30508: Prepare persistent volumes in slave. Tue, 10 Feb, 18:33
Jie Yu Review Request 30509: Added executor working directory to Container struct in Mesos containerizer. Mon, 02 Feb, 18:30
Jie Yu   Re: Review Request 30509: Added executor working directory to Container struct in Mesos containerizer. Mon, 02 Feb, 18:31
Jie Yu     Re: Review Request 30509: Added executor working directory to Container struct in Mesos containerizer. Mon, 02 Feb, 18:37
Ian Downes       Re: Review Request 30509: Added executor working directory to Container struct in Mesos containerizer. Mon, 02 Feb, 19:56
Jie Yu         Re: Review Request 30509: Added executor working directory to Container struct in Mesos containerizer. Mon, 02 Feb, 19:57
Jie Yu       Re: Review Request 30509: Added executor working directory to Container struct in Mesos containerizer. Mon, 02 Feb, 20:06
Jie Yu         Re: Review Request 30509: Added executor working directory to Container struct in Mesos containerizer. Wed, 04 Feb, 22:56
Timothy Chen           Re: Review Request 30509: Added executor working directory to Container struct in Mesos containerizer. Thu, 05 Feb, 01:24
Jie Yu             Re: Review Request 30509: Added executor working directory to Container struct in Mesos containerizer. Mon, 09 Feb, 22:49
Jie Yu           Re: Review Request 30509: Added executor working directory to Container struct in Mesos containerizer. Mon, 09 Feb, 18:00
Vinod Kone             Re: Review Request 30509: Added executor working directory to Container struct in Mesos containerizer. Tue, 10 Feb, 18:35
Jie Yu Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Mon, 02 Feb, 18:32
Dominic Hamon   Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Mon, 02 Feb, 18:35
Jie Yu   Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Mon, 02 Feb, 18:36
Mesos ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Mon, 02 Feb, 20:49
Ian Downes     Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Mon, 02 Feb, 21:20
Jie Yu       Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Tue, 03 Feb, 00:23
Ian Downes       Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Wed, 04 Feb, 18:07
Jie Yu       Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Tue, 10 Feb, 00:31
Jie Yu     Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Wed, 04 Feb, 22:57
Mesos ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Thu, 05 Feb, 00:59
Jie Yu       Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Mon, 09 Feb, 18:00
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Mon, 09 Feb, 18:53
Vinod Kone         Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Mon, 09 Feb, 20:24
Jie Yu           Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Tue, 10 Feb, 00:31
Jie Yu         Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Tue, 10 Feb, 01:09
Jie Yu           Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Tue, 10 Feb, 01:13
Mesos ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Tue, 10 Feb, 03:20
Vinod Kone             Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Tue, 10 Feb, 18:51
Jie Yu             Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Mon, 23 Feb, 07:06
Mesos ReviewBot               Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Mon, 23 Feb, 12:04
Vinod Kone               Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Wed, 25 Feb, 19:30
Jie Yu                 Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Wed, 25 Feb, 22:36
Jie Yu               Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Wed, 25 Feb, 22:41
Mesos ReviewBot                 Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Thu, 26 Feb, 00:22
Vinod Kone                 Re: Review Request 30510: Allowed Mesos containerizer to prepare and update volumes. Thu, 26 Feb, 00:26
Re: Review Request 28252: Add initializer_list constructor to hashmap
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 28252: Add initializer_list constructor to hashmap Mon, 02 Feb, 18:34
Jie Yu Review Request 30512: Fixed DiskUsageCollectorTest.SymbolicLink so that it works on both ext3 and ext4. Mon, 02 Feb, 18:38
Vinod Kone   Re: Review Request 30512: Fixed DiskUsageCollectorTest.SymbolicLink so that it works on both ext3 and ext4. Mon, 02 Feb, 19:46
Jie Yu     Re: Review Request 30512: Fixed DiskUsageCollectorTest.SymbolicLink so that it works on both ext3 and ext4. Mon, 02 Feb, 19:48
Jie Yu   Re: Review Request 30512: Fixed DiskUsageCollectorTest.SymbolicLink so that it works on both ext3 and ext4. Mon, 02 Feb, 19:48
Vinod Kone     Re: Review Request 30512: Fixed DiskUsageCollectorTest.SymbolicLink so that it works on both ext3 and ext4. Mon, 02 Feb, 19:54
Mesos ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 30512: Fixed DiskUsageCollectorTest.SymbolicLink so that it works on both ext3 and ext4. Mon, 02 Feb, 22:13
Vinod Kone Review Request 30511: Moved framework related rate limiters into Master::Frameworks. Mon, 02 Feb, 18:39
Jiang Yan Xu   Re: Review Request 30511: Moved framework related rate limiters into Master::Frameworks. Mon, 02 Feb, 18:43
Ben Mahler   Re: Review Request 30511: Moved framework related rate limiters into Master::Frameworks. Tue, 03 Feb, 02:10
Jiang Yan Xu     Re: Review Request 30511: Moved framework related rate limiters into Master::Frameworks. Tue, 03 Feb, 18:27
Vinod Kone   Re: Review Request 30511: Moved framework related rate limiters into Master::Frameworks. Tue, 03 Feb, 18:28
Vinod Kone     Re: Review Request 30511: Moved framework related rate limiters into Master::Frameworks. Wed, 04 Feb, 00:30
Jie Yu Review Request 30513: Added validation for CREATE offer operation. Mon, 02 Feb, 18:40
Dominic Hamon   Re: Review Request 30513: Added validation for CREATE offer operation. Mon, 02 Feb, 18:43
Vinod Kone     Re: Review Request 30513: Added validation for CREATE offer operation. Tue, 03 Feb, 20:15
Jie Yu     Re: Review Request 30513: Added validation for CREATE offer operation. Tue, 03 Feb, 23:16
Mesos ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 30513: Added validation for CREATE offer operation. Mon, 02 Feb, 21:23
Vinod Kone   Re: Review Request 30513: Added validation for CREATE offer operation. Tue, 03 Feb, 20:15
Jie Yu     Re: Review Request 30513: Added validation for CREATE offer operation. Tue, 03 Feb, 23:19
Jie Yu     Re: Review Request 30513: Added validation for CREATE offer operation. Tue, 03 Feb, 23:19
Jie Yu   Re: Review Request 30513: Added validation for CREATE offer operation. Tue, 03 Feb, 23:15
Jie Yu     Re: Review Request 30513: Added validation for CREATE offer operation. Tue, 03 Feb, 23:19
Mesos ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 30513: Added validation for CREATE offer operation. Wed, 04 Feb, 00:03
Jie Yu       Re: Review Request 30513: Added validation for CREATE offer operation. Wed, 04 Feb, 01:10
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 30513: Added validation for CREATE offer operation. Wed, 04 Feb, 02:21
Vinod Kone         Re: Review Request 30513: Added validation for CREATE offer operation. Wed, 04 Feb, 19:34
Apache Jenkins Server Build failed in Jenkins: mesos-reviewbot #3835 Mon, 02 Feb, 18:45
Apache Jenkins Server   Build failed in Jenkins: mesos-reviewbot #3836 Mon, 02 Feb, 19:05
Apache Jenkins Server     Build failed in Jenkins: mesos-reviewbot #3837 Mon, 02 Feb, 19:25
Apache Jenkins Server       Build failed in Jenkins: mesos-reviewbot #3838 Mon, 02 Feb, 19:46
Apache Jenkins Server         Build failed in Jenkins: mesos-reviewbot #3839 Mon, 02 Feb, 20:06
Apache Jenkins Server           Jenkins build is back to normal : mesos-reviewbot #3840 Mon, 02 Feb, 20:49
Vinod Kone         Re: Build failed in Jenkins: mesos-reviewbot #3838 Mon, 02 Feb, 20:07
Vinod Kone Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Mon, 02 Feb, 18:49
Vinod Kone   Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Mon, 02 Feb, 18:51
Dominic Hamon     Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Mon, 02 Feb, 18:55
Vinod Kone       Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Tue, 03 Feb, 02:37
Jie Yu     Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Mon, 02 Feb, 20:13
Vinod Kone       Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Tue, 03 Feb, 02:37
Mesos ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Mon, 02 Feb, 23:05
Vinod Kone     Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Tue, 03 Feb, 02:39
Mesos ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Tue, 03 Feb, 03:19
David Robinson       Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Tue, 03 Feb, 18:09
Vinod Kone         Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Tue, 03 Feb, 18:42
Jie Yu       Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Tue, 03 Feb, 18:16
Vinod Kone         Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Tue, 03 Feb, 18:42
Jie Yu       Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Tue, 03 Feb, 18:25
Vinod Kone         Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Tue, 03 Feb, 18:42
Vinod Kone       Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Tue, 03 Feb, 18:42
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Tue, 03 Feb, 19:24
Vinod Kone         Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Wed, 04 Feb, 00:31
Vinod Kone           Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Wed, 04 Feb, 01:51
Ben Mahler             Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Wed, 04 Feb, 20:01
Jie Yu               Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Wed, 04 Feb, 20:12
Jie Yu               Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Wed, 04 Feb, 20:14
Ben Mahler               Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Wed, 04 Feb, 20:27
Jie Yu               Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Wed, 04 Feb, 20:42
Vinod Kone               Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Wed, 04 Feb, 22:16
Jie Yu               Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Wed, 04 Feb, 22:26
Vinod Kone               Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Wed, 04 Feb, 22:35
Vinod Kone             Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Wed, 04 Feb, 22:43
Ben Mahler               Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Wed, 04 Feb, 23:01
Jie Yu                 Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Wed, 04 Feb, 23:09
Vinod Kone                 Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Thu, 05 Feb, 00:08
Vinod Kone               Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Thu, 05 Feb, 00:13
Ben Mahler                 Re: Review Request 30514: Rate limited the removal of slaves failing health checks. Thu, 05 Feb, 00:23
Jake Farrell Review Request 30518: fix reviewboard setting so all users have same rbt settings Mon, 02 Feb, 18:56
Vinod Kone   Re: Review Request 30518: fix reviewboard setting so all users have same rbt settings Mon, 02 Feb, 19:01
Jake Farrell   Re: Review Request 30518: MESOS-2313: Fix reviewboard setting so all users have same rbt settings Mon, 02 Feb, 19:34
Vinod Kone     Re: Review Request 30518: MESOS-2313: Fix reviewboard setting so all users have same rbt settings Mon, 02 Feb, 19:57
Re: Review Request 29533: Added a URL abstraction to stout.
Alexander Rukletsov   Re: Review Request 29533: Added a URL abstraction to stout. Mon, 02 Feb, 18:57
Re: Review Request 30300: Moved internal protobufs from mesos::internal to mesos namespace.
Kapil Arya   Re: Review Request 30300: Moved internal protobufs from mesos::internal to mesos namespace. Mon, 02 Feb, 21:02
Kapil Arya     Re: Review Request 30300: Moved internal protobufs from mesos::internal to mesos namespace. Thu, 05 Feb, 03:15
Niklas Nielsen       Re: Review Request 30300: Moved internal protobufs from mesos::internal to mesos namespace. Thu, 05 Feb, 22:16
Re: Review Request 30295: Removed mesos::internal namespace.
Kapil Arya   Re: Review Request 30295: Removed mesos::internal namespace. Mon, 02 Feb, 21:03
Kapil Arya     Re: Review Request 30295: Removed mesos::internal namespace. Thu, 05 Feb, 03:15
Niklas Nielsen       Re: Review Request 30295: Removed mesos::internal namespace. Thu, 05 Feb, 19:55
Kapil Arya         Re: Review Request 30295: Removed mesos::internal namespace. Thu, 05 Feb, 22:07
Kapil Arya       Re: Review Request 30295: Removed mesos::internal namespace. Thu, 05 Feb, 22:08
Niklas Nielsen         Re: Review Request 30295: Removed mesos::internal namespace. Thu, 05 Feb, 22:16
Re: Review Request 29598: Moved Modules protobuf to mesos/modules.proto.
Kapil Arya   Re: Review Request 29598: Moved Modules protobuf to mesos/modules.proto. Mon, 02 Feb, 21:03
Kapil Arya     Re: Review Request 29598: Moved Modules protobuf to mesos/modules.proto. Tue, 03 Feb, 00:42
Kapil Arya       Re: Review Request 29598: Moved Modules protobuf to mesos/modules.proto. Thu, 05 Feb, 03:15
Niklas Nielsen         Re: Review Request 29598: Moved Modules protobuf to mesos/modules.proto. Tue, 10 Feb, 00:52
Kapil Arya         Re: Review Request 29598: Moved Modules protobuf to mesos/modules.proto. Tue, 10 Feb, 02:37
Re: Review Request 29781: Exposed type_utils.hpp as include/mesos/type_utils.hpp.
Kapil Arya   Re: Review Request 29781: Exposed type_utils.hpp as include/mesos/type_utils.hpp. Mon, 02 Feb, 21:03
Kapil Arya     Re: Review Request 29781: Exposed type_utils.hpp as include/mesos/type_utils.hpp. Thu, 05 Feb, 03:15
Niklas Nielsen       Re: Review Request 29781: Exposed type_utils.hpp as include/mesos/type_utils.hpp. Tue, 10 Feb, 01:20
Kapil Arya       Re: Review Request 29781: Exposed type_utils.hpp as include/mesos/type_utils.hpp. Tue, 10 Feb, 02:38
Kapil Arya         Re: Review Request 29781: Exposed type_utils.hpp as include/mesos/type_utils.hpp. Tue, 10 Feb, 02:53
Re: Review Request 30338: Introduced ExecutorRunState struct for Isolators and Launchers.
Kapil Arya   Re: Review Request 30338: Introduced ExecutorRunState struct for Isolators and Launchers. Mon, 02 Feb, 21:04
Kapil Arya     Re: Review Request 30338: Introduced ExecutorRunState struct for Isolators and Launchers. Mon, 02 Feb, 21:08
Kapil Arya       Re: Review Request 30338: Introduced ExecutorRunState struct for Isolators and Launchers. Thu, 05 Feb, 03:15
Kapil Arya   Re: Review Request 30338: Introduced ExecutorRunState struct for Isolators and Launchers. Tue, 10 Feb, 02:38
Niklas Nielsen     Re: Review Request 30338: Introduced ExecutorRunState struct for Isolators and Launchers. Tue, 10 Feb, 02:47
Kapil Arya     Re: Review Request 30338: Introduced ExecutorRunState struct for Isolators and Launchers. Tue, 10 Feb, 02:53
Niklas Nielsen       Re: Review Request 30338: Introduced ExecutorRunState struct for Isolators and Launchers. Tue, 10 Feb, 17:58
Re: Review Request 29603: Exposed slave/containerizer/isolator.hpp as mesos/slave/isolator.hpp
Kapil Arya   Re: Review Request 29603: Exposed slave/containerizer/isolator.hpp as mesos/slave/isolator.hpp Mon, 02 Feb, 21:08
Kapil Arya     Re: Review Request 29603: Exposed slave/containerizer/isolator.hpp as mesos/slave/isolator.hpp Thu, 05 Feb, 03:16
Niklas Nielsen       Re: Review Request 29603: Exposed slave/containerizer/isolator.hpp as mesos/slave/isolator.hpp Tue, 10 Feb, 02:03
Kapil Arya       Re: Review Request 29603: Exposed slave/containerizer/isolator.hpp as mesos/slave/isolator.hpp Tue, 10 Feb, 02:38
Kapil Arya         Re: Review Request 29603: Exposed slave/containerizer/isolator.hpp as mesos/slave/isolator.hpp Tue, 10 Feb, 02:54
Re: Review Request 29604: Exposed module/isolator.hpp for out-of-tree module building.
Kapil Arya   Re: Review Request 29604: Exposed module/isolator.hpp for out-of-tree module building. Mon, 02 Feb, 21:08
Kapil Arya     Re: Review Request 29604: Exposed module/isolator.hpp for out-of-tree module building. Thu, 05 Feb, 03:16
Kapil Arya       Re: Review Request 29604: Exposed module/isolator.hpp for out-of-tree module building. Tue, 10 Feb, 02:38
Re: Review Request 29605: Moved authentication messages to mesos/authentication.proto.
Kapil Arya   Re: Review Request 29605: Moved authentication messages to mesos/authentication.proto. Mon, 02 Feb, 21:09
Kapil Arya     Re: Review Request 29605: Moved authentication messages to mesos/authentication.proto. Thu, 05 Feb, 03:16
Niklas Nielsen       Re: Review Request 29605: Moved authentication messages to mesos/authentication.proto. Tue, 10 Feb, 01:22
Kapil Arya       Re: Review Request 29605: Moved authentication messages to mesos/authentication.proto. Tue, 10 Feb, 02:39
Re: Review Request 29606: Exposed authentication headers.
Kapil Arya   Re: Review Request 29606: Exposed authentication headers. Mon, 02 Feb, 21:09
Kapil Arya     Re: Review Request 29606: Exposed authentication headers. Thu, 05 Feb, 03:16
Niklas Nielsen       Re: Review Request 29606: Exposed authentication headers. Tue, 10 Feb, 01:28
Kapil Arya       Re: Review Request 29606: Exposed authentication headers. Tue, 10 Feb, 02:39
Re: Review Request 30052: Exposed Hook headers.
Kapil Arya   Re: Review Request 30052: Exposed Hook headers. Mon, 02 Feb, 21:09
Kapil Arya     Re: Review Request 30052: Exposed Hook headers. Thu, 05 Feb, 03:16
Niklas Nielsen       Re: Review Request 30052: Exposed Hook headers. Tue, 10 Feb, 01:15
Timothy Chen       Re: Review Request 30052: Exposed Hook headers. Tue, 10 Feb, 01:22
Kapil Arya       Re: Review Request 30052: Exposed Hook headers. Tue, 10 Feb, 02:40
Re: Review Request 29595: Link against libpthread.
Kapil Arya   Re: Review Request 29595: Link against libpthread. Mon, 02 Feb, 22:15
Cody Maloney   Re: Review Request 29595: Link against libpthread. Tue, 03 Feb, 22:42
Till Toenshoff   Re: Review Request 29595: Link against libpthread. Wed, 18 Feb, 05:48
Re: Review Request 28608: Allowed slave to create and link persistent volumes.
Jie Yu   Re: Review Request 28608: Allowed slave to create and link persistent volumes. Mon, 02 Feb, 23:08
Dominic Hamon Review Request 30531: Remove strings::format and unnecessary constants from paths Mon, 02 Feb, 23:40
Mesos ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 30531: Remove strings::format and unnecessary constants from paths Tue, 03 Feb, 00:23
Jie Yu   Re: Review Request 30531: Remove strings::format and unnecessary constants from paths Wed, 04 Feb, 01:32
Dominic Hamon     Re: Review Request 30531: Remove strings::format and unnecessary constants from paths Wed, 04 Feb, 17:25
Jie Yu     Re: Review Request 30531: Remove strings::format and unnecessary constants from paths Wed, 04 Feb, 17:30
Jie Yu     Re: Review Request 30531: Remove strings::format and unnecessary constants from paths Wed, 04 Feb, 17:38
Dominic Hamon   Re: Review Request 30531: Remove strings::format and unnecessary constants from paths Wed, 04 Feb, 17:22
Jie Yu     Re: Review Request 30531: Remove strings::format and unnecessary constants from paths Wed, 04 Feb, 17:25
Dominic Hamon     Re: Review Request 30531: Remove strings::format and unnecessary constants from paths Wed, 04 Feb, 17:40
Re: Python bindings are changing!
Benjamin Mahler   Re: Python bindings are changing! Tue, 03 Feb, 00:17
Jie Yu Review Request 30536: Renamed persisted resources to checkpointed resources. Tue, 03 Feb, 01:06
Jie Yu   Re: Review Request 30536: Renamed persisted resources to checkpointed resources. Tue, 03 Feb, 01:10
Ben Mahler     Re: Review Request 30536: Renamed persisted resources to checkpointed resources. Tue, 03 Feb, 01:45
Mesos ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 30536: Renamed persisted resources to checkpointed resources. Tue, 03 Feb, 01:49
Re: Review Request 30428: Added hidden field to labels
Kapil Arya   Re: Review Request 30428: Added hidden field to labels Tue, 03 Feb, 01:09
Chi Zhang Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Tue, 03 Feb, 05:28
Nikita Vetoshkin   Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Tue, 03 Feb, 09:06
Timothy Chen     Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Tue, 03 Feb, 09:17
Timothy Chen   Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Tue, 03 Feb, 09:16
Chi Zhang     Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Thu, 12 Feb, 20:08
Dominic Hamon   Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Tue, 03 Feb, 17:42
Chi Zhang     Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Thu, 12 Feb, 20:08
Ian Downes   Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Tue, 03 Feb, 18:42
Chi Zhang     Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Thu, 12 Feb, 20:08
Chi Zhang   Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Wed, 04 Feb, 19:50
Dominic Hamon     Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Wed, 04 Feb, 23:47
Chi Zhang       Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Thu, 12 Feb, 20:08
Ian Downes     Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Thu, 05 Feb, 00:07
Jie Yu     Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Thu, 05 Feb, 00:50
Chi Zhang       Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Thu, 12 Feb, 20:08
Chi Zhang     Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Thu, 12 Feb, 20:08
Dominic Hamon       Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Thu, 12 Feb, 21:06
Chi Zhang         Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Thu, 12 Feb, 23:14
Chi Zhang         Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Thu, 12 Feb, 23:22
Chi Zhang       Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Fri, 13 Feb, 18:08
Dominic Hamon         Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Tue, 17 Feb, 19:06
Chi Zhang         Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Tue, 17 Feb, 20:12
Jie Yu           Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Wed, 18 Feb, 18:36
Chi Zhang           Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Fri, 20 Feb, 21:37
Dominic Hamon             Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Fri, 20 Feb, 21:56
Chi Zhang               Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Sun, 22 Feb, 05:13
Jie Yu             Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Sat, 21 Feb, 01:27
Chi Zhang               Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Sun, 22 Feb, 05:13
Chi Zhang               Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Sun, 22 Feb, 05:13
Chi Zhang             Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Sun, 22 Feb, 05:13
Chi Zhang               Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Mon, 23 Feb, 04:43
Dominic Hamon                 Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Mon, 23 Feb, 17:15
Chi Zhang                   Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Mon, 23 Feb, 20:07
Ian Downes                 Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Mon, 23 Feb, 17:28
Chi Zhang                   Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Mon, 23 Feb, 20:07
Jie Yu                 Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Mon, 23 Feb, 18:14
Chi Zhang                 Re: Review Request 30545: cgroups: added support to listen on memory pressures. Mon, 23 Feb, 20:06
Chi Zhang Review Request 30546: MemIsolator: expose memory pressures for containers. Tue, 03 Feb, 05:29
Mesos ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 30546: MemIsolator: expose memory pressures for containers. Tue, 03 Feb, 06:09
Dominic Hamon   Re: Review Request 30546: MemIsolator: expose memory pressures for containers. Tue, 03 Feb, 17:56
Ian Downes   Re: Review Request 30546: MemIsolator: expose memory pressures for containers. Tue, 03 Feb, 18:49
Chi Zhang   Re: Review Request 30546: MemIsolator: expose memory pressures for containers. Sat, 28 Feb, 01:43
Dominic Hamon     Re: Review Request 30546: MemIsolator: expose memory pressures for containers. Sat, 28 Feb, 01:59
Mesos ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 30546: MemIsolator: expose memory pressures for containers. Sat, 28 Feb, 02:21
Re: Review Request 28697: Added ReservationType for dynamic reservations.
Benjamin Hindman   Re: Review Request 28697: Added ReservationType for dynamic reservations. Tue, 03 Feb, 05:29
Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations.
Till Toenshoff   Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Tue, 03 Feb, 11:05
Mesos ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Tue, 03 Feb, 11:58
Vinod Kone     Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Tue, 03 Feb, 20:56
Till Toenshoff       Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Fri, 13 Feb, 15:24
Adam B     Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Wed, 04 Feb, 02:29
Till Toenshoff       Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Fri, 13 Feb, 15:24
Till Toenshoff     Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Fri, 13 Feb, 15:20
Adam B       Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Tue, 17 Feb, 07:37
Till Toenshoff         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Tue, 17 Feb, 16:17
Adam B         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Wed, 18 Feb, 10:41
Till Toenshoff       Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Wed, 18 Feb, 03:57
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Wed, 18 Feb, 06:54
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Wed, 18 Feb, 08:00
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Wed, 18 Feb, 09:29
Adam B         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Wed, 18 Feb, 10:50
Till Toenshoff           Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 14:02
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Wed, 18 Feb, 14:57
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Wed, 18 Feb, 16:20
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Wed, 18 Feb, 17:56
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Wed, 18 Feb, 18:44
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Wed, 18 Feb, 19:43
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Wed, 18 Feb, 20:59
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Wed, 18 Feb, 22:20
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 00:59
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 04:14
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 06:00
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 06:40
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 07:19
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 08:00
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 08:54
Mesos ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 10:44
Till Toenshoff         Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 11:42
Mesos ReviewBot           Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 13:12
Till Toenshoff           Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 14:02
Mesos ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 14:03
Mesos ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 15:17
Mesos ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 16:55
Mesos ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 17:49
Mesos ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 19:27
Mesos ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 20:15
Mesos ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 19 Feb, 22:20
Mesos ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Fri, 20 Feb, 01:02
Mesos ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Fri, 20 Feb, 04:11
Mesos ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Fri, 20 Feb, 06:14
Mesos ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Fri, 20 Feb, 07:39
Mesos ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Fri, 20 Feb, 16:40
Mesos ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Fri, 20 Feb, 18:00
Mesos ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Fri, 20 Feb, 18:46
Vinod Kone             Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Fri, 20 Feb, 22:19
Till Toenshoff               Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Sat, 21 Feb, 06:41
Adam B               Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Sat, 21 Feb, 11:23
Till Toenshoff               Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Sat, 21 Feb, 22:07
Till Toenshoff               Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Mon, 23 Feb, 01:49
Vinod Kone               Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Fri, 27 Feb, 19:38
Till Toenshoff             Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Sat, 21 Feb, 22:16
Mesos ReviewBot               Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Sat, 21 Feb, 22:59
Adam B               Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Sun, 22 Feb, 07:11
Till Toenshoff                 Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Sun, 22 Feb, 22:03
Till Toenshoff               Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Sun, 22 Feb, 22:03
Mesos ReviewBot                 Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Sun, 22 Feb, 22:50
Niklas Nielsen                 Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 26 Feb, 00:01
Niklas Nielsen                   Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Thu, 26 Feb, 23:07
Adam B                   Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Fri, 27 Feb, 09:16
Till Toenshoff                 Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Fri, 27 Feb, 02:28
Mesos ReviewBot                   Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Fri, 27 Feb, 04:32
Till Toenshoff   Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Fri, 13 Feb, 15:24
Till Toenshoff   Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Wed, 18 Feb, 04:30
Adam B   Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Wed, 18 Feb, 09:53
Vinod Kone   Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Wed, 18 Feb, 18:58
Till Toenshoff   Re: Review Request 27760: Revised authenticator interface to allow for two fold implementations. Sat, 21 Feb, 22:00
Chengwei Yang When does scheduler driver send the LaunchTasksMessage Tue, 03 Feb, 13:46
Adam Bordelon   Re: When does scheduler driver send the LaunchTasksMessage Tue, 03 Feb, 15:28
Chengwei Yang     Re: When does scheduler driver send the LaunchTasksMessage Wed, 04 Feb, 01:06
Vinod Kone   Re: When does scheduler driver send the LaunchTasksMessage Wed, 04 Feb, 01:21
Adam Bordelon     Re: When does scheduler driver send the LaunchTasksMessage Wed, 04 Feb, 01:52
Chengwei Yang       Re: When does scheduler driver send the LaunchTasksMessage Wed, 04 Feb, 03:06
Chengwei Yang     Re: When does scheduler driver send the LaunchTasksMessage Wed, 04 Feb, 03:04
Vinod Kone       Re: When does scheduler driver send the LaunchTasksMessage Wed, 04 Feb, 18:53
Chengwei Yang         Re: When does scheduler driver send the LaunchTasksMessage Thu, 05 Feb, 03:47
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Jan 201930
Dec 201838
Nov 201829
Oct 201850
Sep 201824
Aug 201852
Jul 2018138
Jun 201872
May 201891
Apr 2018124
Mar 2018171
Feb 2018127
Jan 2018108
Dec 201765
Nov 2017115
Oct 2017106
Sep 2017131
Aug 2017108
Jul 2017101
Jun 2017164
May 2017159
Apr 201759
Mar 201797
Feb 2017111
Jan 2017102
Dec 2016166
Nov 2016173
Oct 2016188
Sep 2016142
Aug 2016190
Jul 2016367
Jun 2016440
May 2016312
Apr 2016211
Mar 2016432
Feb 2016269
Jan 2016277
Dec 2015153
Nov 2015258
Oct 2015230
Sep 2015188
Aug 2015169
Jul 2015250
Jun 2015188
May 2015160
Apr 20151108
Mar 20151776
Feb 20152114
Jan 20152110
Dec 20141060
Nov 20141679
Oct 20142059
Sep 20141281
Aug 20141286
Jul 20141091
Jun 20142156
May 20142221
Apr 20142205
Mar 20142413
Feb 20141470
Jan 20141439
Dec 2013626
Nov 2013942
Oct 20131038
Sep 2013575
Aug 20131028
Jul 20131246
Jun 20131914
May 2013993
Apr 20131130
Mar 2013965
Feb 2013679
Jan 2013355
Dec 2012269
Nov 2012342
Oct 2012480
Sep 2012395
Aug 2012437
Jul 2012379
Jun 2012199
May 2012351
Apr 2012246
Mar 2012541
Feb 2012323
Jan 2012360
Dec 2011129
Nov 2011309
Oct 201180
Sep 20113
Aug 201139
Jul 201153
Jun 201164
May 20115
Apr 20111
Mar 20111
Feb 201114
Jan 201113