Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-mesos-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-mesos-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5186F17956 for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 07:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61095 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2014 07:19:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-mesos-dev-archive@mesos.apache.org Received: (qmail 61026 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2014 07:19:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@mesos.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@mesos.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@mesos.apache.org Received: (qmail 61013 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2014 07:19:05 -0000 Received: from reviews-vm.apache.org (HELO reviews.apache.org) (140.211.11.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 07:19:05 +0000 Received: from reviews.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by reviews.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB4C1D43C1; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 07:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============2248806952661252316==" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Review Request 26247: Remove usage of from mesos. From: "Mesos ReviewBot" To: "Dominic Hamon" Cc: "Mesos ReviewBot" , "mesos" , "Michael Park" Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 07:19:02 -0000 Message-ID: <20141005071902.12762.87223@reviews.apache.org> X-ReviewBoard-URL: https://reviews.apache.org Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Sender: "Mesos ReviewBot" X-ReviewGroup: mesos X-ReviewRequest-URL: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26247/ X-Sender: "Mesos ReviewBot" References: <20141005070846.12760.83559@reviews.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <20141005070846.12760.83559@reviews.apache.org> Reply-To: "Mesos ReviewBot" X-ReviewRequest-Repository: mesos-git --===============2248806952661252316== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26247/#review55469 ----------------------------------------------------------- Bad patch! Reviews applied: [26245, 26245] Failed command: git apply --index 26245.patch Error: error: patch failed: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/Makefile.am:27 error: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/Makefile.am: patch does not apply error: patch failed: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/json.hpp:23 error: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/json.hpp: patch does not apply error: patch failed: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/lambda.hpp:21 error: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/lambda.hpp: patch does not apply error: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/list.hpp: does not exist in index error: patch failed: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/memory.hpp:1 error: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/memory.hpp: patch does not apply error: patch failed: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/set.hpp:1 error: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/set.hpp: patch does not apply error: patch failed: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/subcommand.hpp:24 error: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/subcommand.hpp: patch does not apply error: patch failed: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/set_tests.cpp:4 error: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/set_tests.cpp: patch does not apply - Mesos ReviewBot On Oct. 5, 2014, 7:08 a.m., Michael Park wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/26247/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 5, 2014, 7:08 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Dominic Hamon. > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > These are changes necessary from removing `` from `stout` and `libprocess`. > With the preprocessor expansion, taking the address of an overloaded function was disambiguated by the number of arguments. > The number of arguments a function takes is not a reliable disambiguation mechanism, we `static_cast` them to a specific signature as we do in other parts of the code where disambiguation of overloaded functions is necessary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/log/log.cpp b3c6c20d734ea82d8531217d53decf1707183565 > src/log/replica.cpp c18de86f2659b848b0e8f0468e4efa820d048970 > src/master/allocator.hpp 02d20d0cc802805bc702891306aa42894531b223 > src/scheduler/scheduler.cpp fb88a3e029e97ba33eae5d50503be5ed9c9533e6 > src/slave/containerizer/composing.cpp 9022700b628d9746a6a8a17c9fbf1b1988da6fca > src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp 9a2948951f57f3ab16291df51cd9f33e5e96add4 > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 9d083294caa5c5a47ba3ceaa1b57346144cb795c > src/slave/status_update_manager.cpp 5d5cf234ef2dd47fa4b1f67be761dbca31659451 > src/tests/mesos.hpp 957e2233cc11c438fd80d3b6d1907a1223093104 > src/zookeeper/zookeeper.cpp d4c24cd500b74d3b979a471b4a32def78958f04a > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26247/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > `make && make check` on `gcc-4.4`, `gcc-4.6`, `gcc-4.8`, `gcc-4.9`, `clang-3.3` and `clang-3.5` > > > Thanks, > > Michael Park > > --===============2248806952661252316==--