mesos-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Till Toenshoff" <toensh...@me.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 26859: Integrated CRAM-MD5 Authenticator module.
Date Fri, 24 Oct 2014 02:25:58 GMT


> On Oct. 22, 2014, 6:24 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/master/flags.hpp, line 339
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26859/diff/2/?file=727113#file727113line339>
> >
> >     I thought the default is going to be cram-md5 to make it backwards compatible?

Indeed, the logic has entirely changed in the now updated review-request proposal, following
MESOS-1966.


- Till


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26859/#review57845
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 21, 2014, 1:01 p.m., Till Toenshoff wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/26859/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 21, 2014, 1:01 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin Hindman, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1889
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1889
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> see summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/flags.hpp 9d06856 
>   src/master/master.hpp 14f1d0f 
>   src/master/master.cpp 0a5c9a3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26859/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> NOTE all three CRAM-MD5 authenticator module related RRs need to get applied before running
make check.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Till Toenshoff
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message