Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-mesos-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-mesos-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F2C01038B for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31513 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2014 19:35:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-mesos-dev-archive@mesos.apache.org Received: (qmail 31460 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2014 19:35:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@mesos.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@mesos.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@mesos.apache.org Received: (qmail 31437 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2014 19:35:22 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:35:22 +0000 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:35:22 +0000 (UTC) From: "Timothy St. Clair (JIRA)" To: dev@mesos.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (MESOS-1037) Exited child process status MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13914951#comment-13914951 ] Timothy St. Clair commented on MESOS-1037: ------------------------------------------ Ahh, that makes perfect sense then. > Exited child process status > --------------------------- > > Key: MESOS-1037 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1037 > Project: Mesos > Issue Type: Bug > Components: libprocess > Affects Versions: 0.17.0 > Environment: Fedora 20 - Linux 3.12.10-300.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Feb 6 22:11:48 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > Reporter: Timothy St. Clair > Assignee: Timothy St. Clair > > During initial packaging I had turned a blind-eye to some failing tests. Upon further investigation there appears to be an issue with how processes are reaped on (F20 ) > It appears that there is a status call on the /proc entry of a child process before waitpid is called, in my env the entry is gone, and the tests yield the following: > [----------] 3 tests from Reap > [ RUN ] Reap.NonChildProcess > libprocess/tests/reap_tests.cpp:84: Failure > status.get() is NONE > [ FAILED ] Reap.NonChildProcess (42 ms) > [ RUN ] Reap.ChildProcess > libprocess/tests/reap_tests.cpp:123: Failure > status.get() is NONE > [ FAILED ] Reap.ChildProcess (31 ms) > [ RUN ] Reap.TerminatedChildProcess > libprocess/tests/reap_tests.cpp:150: Failure > process is NONE > Process 18856 reaped unexpectedly > [ FAILED ] Reap.TerminatedChildProcess (3 ms) > [----------] 3 tests from Reap (76 ms total) > [----------] 4 tests from Subprocess > [ RUN ] Subprocess.status > libprocess/tests/subprocess_tests.cpp:40: Failure > s.get().status().get() is NONE > [ FAILED ] Subprocess.status (30 ms) > [ RUN ] Subprocess.output > libprocess/tests/subprocess_tests.cpp:129: Failure > s.get().status().get() is NONE > [ FAILED ] Subprocess.output (31 ms) > [ RUN ] Subprocess.input > libprocess/tests/subprocess_tests.cpp:182: Failure > s.get().status().get() is NONE > [ FAILED ] Subprocess.input (31 ms) > [ RUN ] Subprocess.splice > libprocess/tests/subprocess_tests.cpp:221: Failure > s.get().status().get() is NONE > [ FAILED ] Subprocess.splice (32 ms) > [----------] 4 tests from Subprocess (124 ms total) > trace of failure: > process::ReaperProcess::reap () at reap.cpp:36 > os:process () at linux.hpp:54 > proc:status () at proc.hpp:174 > Branch for 0.18.0-rc2 build can be found here: https://github.com/timothysc/mesos/tree/0.18.0-post-shuffle -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)