mesos-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ben Mahler" <benjamin.mah...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review Request: Adjusted the sched.cpp log levels based on importance.
Date Thu, 02 May 2013 19:35:31 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10900/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated May 2, 2013, 7:35 p.m.)


Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone.


Changes
-------

Vinod's review.


Description (updated)
-------

Since everything is VLOG, I had the following in mind for levels:
  1: Important things, including errors.
  2: Information expected during normal operation.
  3: Additional information for debugging.

Based on data from an internal framework at Twitter:
$ grep sched.cpp framework.log | cut -d']' -f1 | awk '{print $NF}' | sort | uniq -c
  10641 sched.cpp:282
  32729 sched.cpp:327
      1 sched.cpp:384
      5 sched.cpp:401

I0502 00:05:07.885108 31669 sched.cpp:282] Received 3 offers
I0502 00:05:08.549502 31677 sched.cpp:327] Status update: task FOO of framework BAR is now
in state TASK_FAILED


Diffs (updated)
-----

  src/sched/sched.cpp a55329488ae886f76fdf4576050cdeb5ead8026b 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10900/diff/


Testing
-------

None.


Thanks,

Ben Mahler


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message