Mailing-List: contact mesos-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: mesos-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of benjamin.mahler@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.128.181 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAA48Z=WQvW8GCOtpgLQi4sRn3KfdJz__-WGdJTq=p3bzMCSVbw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAA48Z=Wbk2thve_PskGbQ4wESuK5aYqC-P-JG5P-rGHYRcSWqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+8RcoRBpWEBeXzfsH3_rSPZEeQoe=Pw7-mX=A3nse_umz3NTQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAkWvAyCmnmpxyEEqb3RmWOQU8Z7Yd6Q1VjJtv+==Dn1Vs4_rw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA48Z=WQvW8GCOtpgLQi4sRn3KfdJz__-WGdJTq=p3bzMCSVbw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Benjamin Mahler <benjamin.mahler@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:43:10 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CA+8RcoTC7Ce7_bUeNwtd7Pw2SY3zuoEBS6L+opDjS4=t3W2GXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Reaper related changes
To: Yan Xu <yan@twitter.com>
Cc: Vinod Kone <vinod@twitter.com>,
 Benjamin Mahler <benjamin.mahler@gmail.com>,
	Benjamin Hindman <benjamin.hindman@gmail.com>,
	"mesos-dev@incubator.apache.org" <mesos-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307d0284768a4904db33cb6c

--20cf307d0284768a4904db33cb6c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

We also have a src/common/process_utils.hpp which contains only
mesos::internal::utils::process::killtree() at the moment.


On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Yan Xu <yan@twitter.com> wrote:

> I guess os:: is fine, but in a separate file?
>
> --
> Jiang Yan Xu <yan@twitter.com> @xujyan <http://twitter.com/xujyan>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Vinod Kone <vinod@twitter.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't like process:: because it conflicts with the libprocess namespace
>> as you mentioned.
>>
>> I still like proc:: but clearly BenH doesn't like it. I'm ok with os::
>> namespace.
>>
>>
>> @vinodkone
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Benjamin Mahler <
>> benjamin.mahler@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any consensus on how to place process utilities in stout? I
>>> would expect this to be in a process:: namespace but of course that is
>>> confusing because we use libprocess, which should perhaps have a
>>> libprocess:: namespace instead..
>>>
>>> I'll be moving process utilities etc into stout, hopefully with the same
>>> calls for linux and OSX but I'm not yet certain if that is possible. I
>>> would like to place these in a process.hpp file inside a process::
>>> namespace.
>>>
>>> I think these read very nicely:
>>> process::alive(pid_t)
>>> process::children(pid_t)
>>> process::stat(pid_t)
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Yan Xu <yan@jxu.me> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This batch of commits changed the reaper to use "Future" as the
>>>> notification mechanism.
>>>>
>>>> Sequence:
>>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10744/
>>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10745/
>>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10746/
>>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10747/
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Yan
>>>> --
>>>> Jiang Yan Xu <yan@twitter.com> @xujyan <http://twitter.com/xujyan>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

--20cf307d0284768a4904db33cb6c--