mesos-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ben Mahler" <benjamin.mah...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review Request: Fixed master to properly remove a non-checkpointing framework when a checkpointing slave exits.
Date Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:51:54 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9945/#review18777
-----------------------------------------------------------


Sounds like the slave could also use some states, e.g.
INITIALIZING
RUNNING
CHECKPOINTING
TERMINATING

- Ben Mahler


On March 15, 2013, 8:37 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9945/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 15, 2013, 8:37 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Sending this out before I write any tests, to get feedback on the semantics.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.hpp c9b4b3f3ff562b75f74a605f3cd7a6957f00d9e7 
>   src/master/master.cpp ecefc8b9fc14b4f0950b053d47bb2d6e464f8724 
>   src/tests/slave_recovery_tests.cpp a1fa485d917e882ad1d950532758c5978e8fbb05 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9945/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinod Kone
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message