maven-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eric Kolotyluk <eric.koloty...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [scala-debate] Emotional Support Group for Typesafe Maven Users
Date Wed, 03 Dec 2014 21:53:43 GMT
Ha ha ha. Very good :-)

I have published to Maven Central, so I know how daunting this can be at 
first.

If you want to publish to Maven Central I recommend 
https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/getting-started-apache-maven-video

Cheers, Eric

On 12/3/2014 11:27 AM, Jon Pretty wrote:
> I can offer you this:
>
> http://play.textadventures.co.uk/Play.aspx?id=zv-wer8keey6rnhk4am25q
>
> It's a create-your-own-adventure about my experience of trying to 
> publish a library to Maven Central. It's a couple of years old now, so 
> the landscape might have improved a little in patches.
>
> Jon
>
> On 3 December 2014 at 19:11, Eric Kolotyluk <eric.kolotyluk@gmail.com 
> <mailto:eric.kolotyluk@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Does anyone know of a good emotional support group for people
>     trying to use Maven with Typesafe projects such as Akka and Play?
>
>     I was thinking maybe there could a buddy/sponsor system, such as
>     used in AA and other self help groups. Maybe there might be group
>     sessions where people can talk about their trauma, especially by
>     being constantly invalidated by comments such as "you should use
>     the simple build tool SBT, cause, well you know, it's simple and
>     easy to use."
>
>     Seriously though, is there a community of people who are
>     successfully using Maven with Akka an Play projects? I would love
>     to meet you.
>
>     I can see why people who have tried Maven naturally think "oh,
>     its' too complicated, anyone can write a simple build tool that
>     does what Maven does." Clearly they do not appreciate what Maven
>     is or what it does. SBT and Gradle are two great examples of
>     projects that attempted to do something more simple, but in the
>     end, really don't measure up.
>
>     I personally think the Scala community would be been better served
>     if more investment was made in developing better Scala build tools
>     within the Maven framework. More and better plugins for Scala,
>     Akka, Play, etc.  Better use of
>
>     http://books.sonatype.com/mcookbook/reference/sect-scala-script-inline.html
>     http://books.sonatype.com/mcookbook/reference/ch03s03.html
>
>     I don't know if there is a Scala template for writing Maven
>     plugins (or mojos), but there should be.
>
>     The more I use SBT, the less I like it. It is not what I consider
>     a serious build tool for build engineers, it is a toy or
>     playground for Scala hackers who thrive on the abstruse. Don't get
>     me wrong, I love Scala, but creating a build tool around .scala
>     files just invites the use of chicken tracks and obscure overly
>     concise cleverness that leads to one WTF experience after another.
>     /It is actually possible to write Scala code that you can reason
>     about,/ but it just as easy to write Scala code that resembles
>     APL, and reasoning about build engineering was clearly not a
>     priority with the designers of SBT.
>
>     The Scala-IDE was a really great approach because it leveraged off
>     of an existing IDE infrastructure such as Eclipse, rather than
>     trying to write an IDE from scratch the way SBT does. I wish the
>     Scala/Typesafe community had taken the same approach with build-tools.
>
>     - Eric
>     -- 
>     You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>     Groups "scala-debate" group.
>     To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>     send an email to scala-debate+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
>     <mailto:scala-debate+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
>     For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Jon Pretty | @propensive


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message