Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8706B11C76 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73774 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2014 14:26:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 73688 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2014 14:26:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Maven Users List" Reply-To: "Maven Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 73676 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2014 14:26:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:26:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andrew.todd659@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.43] (HELO mail-qa0-f43.google.com) (209.85.216.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:26:20 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id w8so4637681qac.30 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:25:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=p4PQlrbg+lpMZhygTFazRBrTN0fw1WXuaSLEJ12ssHo=; b=Qoirv7nPoKpiOvhbyEDakuMPJyhyX3Q0yEeHP8WsgRpD2JH5/Pv8OoPutxWP2X90tn tPMmNgDT8LC/YuwS1uitm6/cub4YA4P/uTO5S4fJyCw1VbxXuY+LAYvxB6v9GwWNS0t/ iKn5EUV7ybBT3lvPTawYBXNQlMPD+Y8A+ECciW5Ta/M3OExjum2uXrmsdM5A/ogGAOqs zyCL508yeTGYkoO42c97GFGUMGPeJqlHsyPRS11u+qsmFepL0q1MPzWitHblOjroIek2 F1PjvFZ32CAHsysKGFTv3MRwj1CpVaWXjqhnN0ie+rCRv8PfKmGaR3cwwhd/7PDeaUt+ Lhxg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.27.108 with SMTP id 99mr27075628qgw.77.1406298359285; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:25:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.34.233 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:25:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <56545b37196b4c8881714e4d3c9331f7@BVLEXCM022.conoco.net> <20140723130324.GA13476@IUPUI.Edu> <53CFB748.7030805@artifact-software.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:25:59 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Re: Why not a forum From: Andrew Todd To: Maven Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c146e4274ea904ff055a01 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c146e4274ea904ff055a01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Apache is an independent non-profit dedicated to the dissemination of free software. The list archives are freely archivable and indexable by anyone who wants to -- and there are many sites, such as Nabble and MarkMail, who do. Using email as the primary means of distribution makes it easy for third parties to do this. On the other hand, LinkedIn is a for-profit corporation with a walled garden solution. It's "free" because it forces people to tie themselves into LinkedIn's system. It can't be easily archived or indexed without LinkedIn's permission. And if they decide to end the service, we're in trouble. There are people like me who will not even create a LinkedIn profile on principle. I don't like the company's business practices. In short, the suggestion is anathema to a free software organization. You might as well tell us to use Facebook as a discussion medium. On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Preston, Dale < Dale.Preston@conocophillips.com> wrote: > I do participate in a couple other Linked-In lists. I'll check that one > out. As the response to this thread shows, though, replies come pretty > quickly in the email list. In any case, the Linked-In list sounds worth > investigating. > > Thanks. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ron Wheeler [mailto:rwheeler@artifact-software.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 8:23 AM > To: users@maven.apache.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: Why not a forum > > On 23/07/2014 9:03 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 03:51:54PM +0000, Preston, Dale wrote: > >> I was just wondering why this group uses an email list rather than a > forum. It seems forum software is more searchable and filterable than > email lists. > > If it had been my choice: because I'd have to go to a forum every day > > (and a hundred others!) while email comes to me. I have plenty of > > powerful email search and filter tools right here on my workstation. > > > > Every time someone proposes some other medium for this sort of > > communication (forum, Twitter, etc.) my first question is "how can I > > get that in email?" I can't think offhand of any forum software I've > > used that isn't uncomfortable, inconvenient and hard to search. > > > The Maven LinkedIn forum will send you e-mails plus LinkedIn will inform > you of activity in discussions in which you are active in all of the groups > to which you belong. > > Ron > > -- > Ron Wheeler > President > Artifact Software Inc > email: rwheeler@artifact-software.com > skype: ronaldmwheeler > phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org > > --001a11c146e4274ea904ff055a01--