Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 702CC10028 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 04:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2686 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2014 04:36:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 2587 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2014 04:36:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Maven Users List" Reply-To: "Maven Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 16691 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2014 12:44:42 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Message-ID: <5314791D.90506@pocock.pro> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 13:44:13 +0100 From: Daniel Pocock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131103 Icedove/17.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: Google Summer of Code - Java opportunity, mentors needed References: <530C66D6.2010602@pocock.com.au>,,<5629A6219DB3E544AB84388D90149787479C9535@xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com>,,<5629A6219DB3E544AB84388D90149787479C9693@xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 27/02/14 02:21, Martin Gainty wrote: > > > >> From: jnord@cisco.com >> To: users@maven.apache.org >> Subject: RE: Google Summer of Code - Java opportunity, mentors needed >> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:17:29 +0000 >> >>>> Nowhere in that was the sources jar mentioned - yet you seemed to have >>> jumped directly to a solution and then said can�t be done. >>> >>> No, I discussed the two paths from the POM: -sources and >> My mistake, sorry. >> >>>> There is a critical need for this inside businesses as well as Debian (how do >>> we know that "org.foobar:baz:1.2.3:jar" is MIT as it claims and doesn�t >>> contain some GPL Code. >>> >>> Which is a fine reason to contribute it Maven 4 where the POM could contain >>> the necessary metadata to enable it. >> This shouldn't prohibit something using what exists now. >> >> One commercial company has done something for some subset of artifacts - which may have been entirely human process/mixed or automated. > MG>How will the aggrgeator mechanism aggreate for this subset of artifacts > MG>Scope? > MG>Classifier? > > MG>With regards to GPLartifacts could'nt we find the necessary violations with Sonatype CLM > MG>(No plug for Sonatype intended) I've put up more details of how this project could be broken down into discrete tasks: http://danielpocock.com/automatically-and-recursively-building-java-projects --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org