Mailing-List: contact users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Maven Users List" <users@maven.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of anders.g.hammar@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: anders.g.hammar@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <651661248729403398d0d4e79a6072ec@DBXPR05MB237.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: 
 <651661248729403398d0d4e79a6072ec@DBXPR05MB237.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:07:58 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAKDUN1t9iU-Dx5sZvK5bBvwHXdYKPOthfBvH8nohEE+s-FFdRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Painless way to update a frameworks group id?
From: Anders Hammar <anders@hammar.net>
To: Maven Users List <users@maven.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c264681df86f04ed538526

--001a11c264681df86f04ed538526
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

AFAIK there is not painless way to solve this.

What you could add to the docs is instructions on how to use an enforcer
rule to ensure that no "bad" libs are pulled in by accident (if the miss
some exclusion). Use the banned deps [1] rule.

/Anders

[1] http://maven.apache.org/enforcer/enforcer-rules/bannedDependencies.html


On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Christofer Dutz
<christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am the current maintainer of the Flexmojos Maven Plugin and contributor
> to the Apache Flex Project.
>
> Currently I am working on a new Version of Flexmojos which is able to work
> with Flex SDKs that have a groupId of org.apache.flex instead of the old
> com.adobe.flex. While building applications with the new groupId was no big
> Problem, we are now facing a Problem, that I don't quite know how to
> elegantly solve it.
>
>
>
> Assuming I am building a Project and I switched the groupId of the Flex
> Framework to "org.apache.flex". As Long as I am building all artifacts in
> the Project this is fine. But as soon as I am using a Flex library that was
> built for com.apache.flex Maven correctly adds that artifacts dependencies
> to the build. Unfortunately this way I have several artifacts in my build
> twice ... once with com.adobe.flex and once with org.apache.flex groupId.
>
>
>
> Now I was suggesting to manually exclude Framework artifacts when using an
> external lib, but I would like to automate this. Therefore I suggested to
> add all the org.apache.flex artifacts as com.adobe.flex artifacts, but to
> set the scope on These to "provided". But it still sort of doesn't feel
> right.
>
>
>
> Any suggestions? Would be really happy to sort this out and make it less
> painfull for my users.
>
>
>
> Chris
>

--001a11c264681df86f04ed538526--