Mailing-List: contact users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Maven Users List" <users@maven.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.192.172 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <op.w7mv77pekdkhrr@robertscholte>
References: 
 <CAMd6iMgu4OTE52FyXdT78_2G=YriRtSgfb3Vu7BcHXvLbpWB4A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+nPnMzvVZE_yx+ct=aOPfOa1vXZocXBNvrk5ks6StbxURiLpQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<op.w7mv77pekdkhrr@robertscholte>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 23:01:43 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CA+nPnMwjy5Un0QoQutH5SCHZ5FSMo7rcg+jGiqyqQdRMrhM1=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Releasing artifacts with and without debug info
From: Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com>
To: Maven Users List <users@maven.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b10cb7561caeb04ecd18365

--047d7b10cb7561caeb04ecd18365
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Or writing a plugin that strips debug info from a .jar and attaches the
stripped artifact with the nodebug classifier...

/me wonders if shade offers this functionality...

On Thursday, 5 December 2013, Robert Scholte wrote:

> Classifier would seem to be appropriate for this case... but I would be
>> interested to see what others say.
>>
>
> I agree on this approach. It will require extra execution blocks for at
> least the maven-compiler-plugin and maven-jar-plugin. You also have to
> decide if you want the maven-surefire-plugin to test both classfolders or
> just the main.
>
> Robert
>
> Op Thu, 05 Dec 2013 11:37:54 +0100 schreef Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com>:
>
>  Well first off I think it would be better to have the full debug info in
>> the main artifact.... as you can always use tooling to strip debug info as
>> a consumer
>>
>> the debug info will have no effect on the transitive dependencies, so from
>> that PoV having a -nodebug.jar makes sense
>>
>> Classifier would seem to be appropriate for this case... but I would be
>> interested to see what others say.
>>
>> The other thing to keep in mind is that Tatu is a very smart guy... there
>> is likely a good reason that he's just forgotten which was his primary
>> reason and the file size is just a secondary reason that is easier to
>> remember.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5 December 2013 07:28, Cemo <cemalettin.koc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>>
>>> Jackson project is using this compiler parameters to reduce jar size.
>>>
>>>           <debug>true</debug>
>>> >           <debuglevel>lines,source</debuglevel>
>>>
>>>
>>> However this is causing a lot pain to debug. Every single artifact has to
>>> be compiled with necessary compiler flags again to be debugged. Before
>>> suggesting something I wanted to be sure about that. Is there any
>>> practice
>>> to distribute artifacts with and without debug info? The first thing
>>> which
>>> came to my mind is *classifier. *Is this a good usage? What do you think?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>

-- 
Sent from my phone

--047d7b10cb7561caeb04ecd18365--