Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25CA310493 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45379 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2013 11:54:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 44985 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2013 11:54:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Maven Users List" Reply-To: "Maven Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 44969 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2013 11:54:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:54:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [81.169.146.162] (HELO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de) (81.169.146.162) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:54:28 +0000 X-RZG-AUTH: :LX4Be0SIeu16wbNasv8W8RZQEB+YvnQt4cE3HTyWZOEUpLgHJrOusRAu8hhO6Bhs+eHsLYk= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com ([IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) by smtp.strato.de (joses mo45) (RZmta 31.29 AUTH) with ESMTPA id 601b17p68AsoEe for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 13:53:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id y10so8828067wgg.0 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 04:53:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=WRpY+JLWZOpg8Tp9+IQ+V2lT4TvdAAEvec9oYYb7aUI=; b=l7dKN4wd+nzWLL8x8ICqP8xvc5TkfTnkruxCMjUNbm1VBvjso92uicMzyy9kYTuF2L UFBRJ6VakEBXpgH9DgEsTa1Dj+8uBvaqVfvQsj5TX4nCLDYXNtuAiUFTHD/IKPEURmag ecGzFaQqvFRbAt97n1yYawg5HiOIwj63JR1K3LOEL/TPBDh6JHVC7unsXE9jIL0pbQ79 OBNxt/miz9pIgcgUy3vwMnnRoBMkDhHUjhL+IXI4HIL1d0xbPUuF56Ehp+L2sfcNI/YD +GMBxRdv3LJtV1Bat+gkXW+RDt82N6NGgFHIMyepIXxlu/xhzfSBZiNN/ci4xjY786MT sHww== X-Received: by 10.180.82.232 with SMTP id l8mr11286008wiy.23.1373284426755; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 04:53:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.104.231 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 04:53:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Arend v. Reinersdorff" Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 13:53:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problem using project.name as build directory To: Maven Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04428b0c6eb92f04e0feb21d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d04428b0c6eb92f04e0feb21d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > That being said, I'm not sure project.name is guaranteed to fallback to > project.artifactId value. So you might be relying on something unstable > here. > This is a good point. I remember reading somewhere that project.name falls back to project.artifactId. But I can't find the reference anymore. Does anyone know if the fallback behavior of project.name is officially documented anywhere? Regards, Arend --f46d04428b0c6eb92f04e0feb21d--