Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CDDD9BE8 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 01:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62540 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2012 01:57:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 62230 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2012 01:57:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Maven Users List" Reply-To: "Maven Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 43356 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2012 20:04:27 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ivalo@iki.fi designates 195.156.147.13 as permitted sender) Message-ID: <4F5127AD.5020700@iki.fi> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:03:57 +0200 From: Ivalo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: using build profiles for WAR plugin [maven-eclipse-plugin] References: <1330551151690-5526140.post@n5.nabble.com> <1330556657341-5526330.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F4EF6C6.1040803@artifact-software.com> <1330626648021-5528742.post@n5.nabble.com> <1330629394151-5528917.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F4FCE9C.6090704@artifact-software.com> <1330630997645-5528994.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F4FE258.1000804@artifact-software.com> <4F506970.8000902@pp6.inet.fi> <4F50C7DC.8080702@artifact-software.com> <4F50E507.5020606@pp6.inet.fi> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org My day job company is associate member of Eclipse so of course Eclipse is tool to use. Markku On 2.3.2012 18:14, Wayne Fay wrote: >> You don't understand how Eclipse IDE works. Eclipse does not have different >> classpaths for testing and actual runtime. So Eclipse basic design is >> faulty. There is bug open since 2008 to provide means to tell Eclipse that > ... >> Of course NetBeans and IntelliJ has correct way to do things but they are >> not an option. > Help me understand this line of thinking... > > Product A is demonstrably broken for what we need and has been since 2008. > Products B and C support our needs perfectly well. One is free, one is not. > And yet B and C are "not an option." > > This doesn't sound rational to me. Why are they not an option for you? > I would challenge that assertion with whoever is making the decision. > > Wayne > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org