Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76521 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 00:28:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 00:28:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 52772 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 00:28:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 52684 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 00:28:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Maven Users List" Reply-To: "Maven Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 52676 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 00:28:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:28:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.230] (HELO smtpout07.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:28:32 +0000 Received: (qmail 3865 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 00:28:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (98.220.239.22) by smtpout07.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.230) with ESMTP; 06 Jan 2011 00:28:09 -0000 Message-ID: <4D250C96.4010903@javactivity.org> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:28:06 -0600 From: Steve Cohen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: mvn deploy and password encryption References: <4D24F27B.8050709@javactivity.org> <4D24F524.10905@javactivity.org> <4D24F8FA.5030509@udo.edu> In-Reply-To: <4D24F8FA.5030509@udo.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I figured that that must be the case. Do you have any idea why this would fail? Could the 3.0.1 vs. 2.2.1 thing be involved or MUST it be that I'm making a mistake I just can't see? On 01/05/2011 05:04 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Steve Cohen wrote: > >> Another thing I notice is that >> >> mvn -ep {password} >> >> when run several times in succession generates different encryptions >> each time. > > This is correct/expected, the encrypted value is also based on a random > salt. > > > Benjamin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org