Mailing-List: contact users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Maven Users List" <users@maven.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jieryn@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=RFWGk64m7VamMvSzMZWw1pGxF496I2lpNd17MyZ1bTVdSXApEH4gpuUzrsgWG5znuc
         OZSL8SfjOsNJopkMdRbQjjxfnEzocZjpJ6Q1buvG+GzVlEXFNE/yNxrqW01oabbIhfdR
         5GKthNvLm4fp+0jxyMRrK2TB7CWQMDpTugRRU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinF-wron1mpGVtwviu9Kk+jsv_h50K-q0yOzniY@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinvTciND4pEhbHRB_e7iTvwsTG4dw-c690C8c7j@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=QtjwYpiUtcdDxBeMcoHzJc7SQLGeAk=fuGSg2@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimZKrGg53aC2_uVeHaw3reKdXRo74Eh5jEgcDDh@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimsG9aM-79DzUSNcphSwAYSSHgQBgiMoQq=dbT4@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=SO5L1kGF0az_zEr1=bmYSN-x5L91K3Z0fODAQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimCBQKQd+Rxet46Co_TDv5r-3nACsuq39pnQKYD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinHUKYmSYVi9SdDh0Q6QHTLS=N=9k5+vHzog-PZ@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTik7CJwKgTSPoBZqe5TMfKO61d+rxsnEHhHYZAqb@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinF-wron1mpGVtwviu9Kk+jsv_h50K-q0yOzniY@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:30:56 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=DbMF5yrjY+6ig_JoT867aBhSO+oT3bYDrDZ4V@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: multi-module agregated test report
From: Jesse Farinacci <jieryn@gmail.com>
To: Maven Users List <users@maven.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Greetings Emerson,

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:30 AM, emerson <echofloripa.yell@gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe it is correct to say that MAVEN 2 HAS NO WAY to aggregate
> surefire reports from different sub-modules and at the same time show
> a summary for each module? Could some one confirm this,then I will
> look for another solution.

That does appear to be the case, but I would be remiss if I didn't
point out the somewhat contradictory requests you're making. You want
the aggregation to maintain the separation. :-)

To address your previous observation about Hudson splitting out by
package, I suppose that may be true but I have structured my projects
in such a way (and I suspect most users have) where this is not an
issue. More specifically, for every project I can remember, there have
been no Java-package/Maven-module path name conflicts.

You could open an enhancement request at the plugin's JIRA instance[0]
but I would expect this enhancement to be fairly unpopular (not
negatively popular, but disinterested) given the aforementioned
opposing philosophical goals.

-Jesse

[0] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE

-- 
There are 10 types of people in this world, those
that can read binary and those that can not.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org