Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58640 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2010 11:56:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Nov 2010 11:56:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 65508 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 11:57:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 65121 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 11:56:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Maven Users List" Reply-To: "Maven Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 65113 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2010 11:56:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 11:56:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.183.49.139] (HELO production.artifact-software.com) (207.183.49.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 11:56:48 +0000 Received: from [192.168.3.179] (unknown [192.168.3.179]) by production.artifact-software.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C7F6A7A32 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:56:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4CD3F0E8.5090206@artifact-software.com> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 07:56:24 -0400 From: Ron Wheeler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maven Users List Subject: Best Practice for using maven for web sites Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Does anyone have any comments on using Maven to build static web sites. The graphic artists building our web sites have created massive projects full of lots of small graphics projects with various versions of things. It would seem reasonable to create small projects to create individual assets such as Flash animations, Photoshop collages, etc. If these assets were held in repo with a version, at least we could find the "released" assets with a known version. This would also fit with our Subversion structure a bit better. The site would then need to be assembled. Has anyone done this or, conversely, can think of reasons why this would be more trouble than it is worth. Ron --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org