maven-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Edelson <justinedel...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: standardized Maven GAV URN?
Date Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:10:59 GMT
On 6/30/10 8:42 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> is : valid within a urn?
Yes.

> 
> On 30 June 2010 13:34, lukewpatterson <lukewpatterson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> Stan Devitt-2 wrote:
>>>
>>> Why would the recommended format here be different than the format used
>> by
>>> the dependency plugin?
>>> (e.g.  junit:junit:jar:3.8.1:test )
>>>
>>
>> I was looking more for a URN for Maven coordinates, which is slightly
>> different than the flattened form of <dependency> elements.  e.g. the
>> <scope> portion isn't part of what I'm looking for, it is more a statement
>> of how I rely upon it
>>
>>
>> Brian Fox-3 wrote:
>>>
>>> Group:artifact:version:classifier:extension is pretty common
>>>
>>
>> I'm trying to wrap my mind around the differences and pros/cons of that vs.
>> a format listed in the Maven docs[1]
>>
>> groupId:artifactId:packaging:classifier:version
>>
>> The format Brian listed seems to work better when some portions are
>> optional.
>>
>> so maybe urn:maven:groupId:artifactId:version:classifier:extension ?
>>
>> [1] http://maven.apache.org/pom.html#Maven_Coordinates
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/standardized-Maven-GAV-URN-tp511480p512112.html
>> Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org


Mime
View raw message