Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 75875 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2004 13:43:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Aug 2004 13:43:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 18504 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2004 13:43:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-users-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 18458 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2004 13:43:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Maven Users List" Reply-To: "Maven Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 18445 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2004 13:43:33 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [134.98.65.18] (HELO gateway.elsag.de) (134.98.65.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with SMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 06:43:31 -0700 Received: from vwall.elsag.de by gateway.elsag.de via smtpd (for hermes.apache.org [209.237.227.199]) with SMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:43:30 +0200 Received: from esmail by esmail via smtpd (for vwall.elsag.de [192.168.100.108]) with SMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:43:28 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: Is there a way to separate maven's repository from my repository? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:43:28 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Is there a way to separate maven's repository from my repository? Thread-Index: AcSK/Hy/y0CYfIBPQESluRSzyn8P3wAdJ2TgAAAnF/A= From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Schaible?= To: "Maven Users List" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Courtney, Craig wrote on Thursday, August 26, 2004 3:33 PM: > Yes I know. The whole point to our creating a repository is > to control what libraries and versions there of get > introduced into our applications. If I am forced to make > available in my repository everything under the sun why > bother. It would be easier to just let every development > team download anything they want and include it in their > build process. The entire reason I was looking at maven was > to start controlling this issue not enabling it. You can't really stop it. There is always a workaround. At least you = have to create then your own (company) repo and prevent direct internet = access, that no-one is able to activate ibiblio simply by adding it to = the remote repositories. Additionally you must ensure (by check-in = policy ?) that no-one uses jar override. But, tell me, why would I not = want to join the project ... Honestly, the POM has detailed information what library in which version = is used. That's enough. If you want to ensure inter-project consistency = you might start to use entities (as described on the wiki) or since RC4 = you can achieve something similar to a certain point by using = (inherited) properties for the versions. - J=F6rg [snip] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org