maven-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeffrey Bonevich <j...@bonevich.com>
Subject Re: Comments property on License
Date Wed, 03 Dec 2003 03:13:24 GMT
done

dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> Enter 'em in Jira, that's the easiest way to keep track.
> 
> My take on most of the stuff below is that it is mostly a by product of 
> extending BaseObject, and the properties, though valid maybe meaningless.
> 
> We should make sure the xsd documents the meaningful stuff only.
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
> 
> 
> 
> Jeffrey Bonevich <jeff@bonevich.com> wrote on 03/12/2003 12:14:07 PM:
> 
> 
>>Cool.  There seems to be a pattern of the base POM classes extending 
>>BaseObject, which has name and id properties, but not necessarily 
>>declaring same in XSD or docs.  Which is better to follow - code, XSD, 
>>docs (my gut sez go with the code)?  Here are the inconsistencies I 
> 
> find:
> 
>>*Organization - has name, no id
>>*Repository - no name or id
>>*Branch - adding name and id means it == Version, but maybe it should?
>>*MailingList - has name, no id
>>*Contributor - has name, no id; adding id means == Developer
>>*License - has name, no id
>>*Dependency - has id, no name
>>*Build - neither
>>*Report - neither
>>
>>Does not necessarily make sense that they all should, nor should code 
>>necessarily be directly reflected in XSD.  But for some (Organization, 
>>Branch, Contributor, License, Dependency?) it makes sense???
>>
>>Do you want the comments issue entered in JIRA?
>>
>>jeff
>>
>>
>>dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
>>
>>>AFAIK,
>>>
>>>comments is missing from the XSD and should be present.
>>>--
>>>dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
>>>Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Jeffrey Bonevich <jeff@bonevich.com> wrote on 30/11/2003 01:41:44 PM:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I am working on the POM editor for mevenide's Eclipse plugin.  Hoping 
>>>>someone in the know could answer this question:
>>>>
>>>>The License class has properties: name, distribution, url, and 
>>>
> comments. 
> 
>>>
>>>> Comments is not discussed in the reference docs, nor is it in the 
>>>>current version of the XSD for maven's project.xml file.
>>>>
>>>>So is comment a deprecated property or just an oversight of XSD and 
>>>
> ref 
> 
>>>>docs?
>>>>
>>>>jeff
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org


Mime
View raw message