Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact scm-dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list scm-dev@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 25738 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2003 00:02:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO adslgateway.multitask.com.au) (202.44.167.185) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 2003 00:02:18 -0000 Received: from sydney1.multitask.com.au ([1.1.1.126]) by adslgateway.multitask.com.au (Lotus Domino Release 6.0) with ESMTP id 2003120811085708-9 ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:08:57 +1100 In-Reply-To: <1070839494.13047.657.camel@localhost.localdomain> To: scm-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: RE: SCM project location? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5 September 26, 2003 From: dion@multitask.com.au Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:04:05 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Sydney1/Multitask Consulting/AU(Release 6.0|September 26, 2002) at 12/08/2003 11:19:45 AM, Serialize complete at 12/08/2003 11:19:45 AM, Itemize by SMTP Server on ADSLGateway/Multitask Consulting/AU(Release 6.0|September 26, 2002) at 08/12/2003 11:08:57 AM, Serialize by Router on ADSLGateway/Multitask Consulting/AU(Release 6.0|September 26, 2002) at 08/12/2003 11:08:59 AM, Serialize complete at 08/12/2003 11:08:59 AM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jason van Zyl wrote on 08/12/2003 10:24:54 AM: > On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 18:38, dion@multitask.com.au wrote: > > Jason van Zyl wrote on 08/12/2003 09:40:18 AM: > > > > > On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 17:02, Vincent Massol wrote: > > > > I tend to agree. This is a question I asked about 6 months ago. > > > > Unfortunately, I can't remember the answer :-) (and I can't find it > > > > again). > > > > > > > > I would be +1 to move it to commons-project as I don't see the direct > > > > link between SCM and Maven. > > > > > > I would be a vehement -1. The project stays where it is. > > > > Do you have an actual reason? > > 1. The mailing list is entirely unmanageable. I can manage it ok on a daily basis with filtering. > 2. The site is often a mess. It's gotten a lot better lately, and ours is nothing to crow about ;-) > > Both of these give users an awful experience. > > 3. The commons is becoming a dumping grounds as seen by the decision to > push JCS into it. > > 4. SCM is definitely related to Maven the project as it certainly falls > withing the realm of development concerns. > > Do you have an actual reason to move it? 1. It's code that is not necessarily build tool related. 2. It's not dependent on Maven As I said, i was just thinking aloud. I'm just waiting for the message about it being 'buried away' in Maven. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/