maven-m2-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Dependency naming convention
Date Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:58:17 GMT
I think it would be much wiser to use a package name for group Id going
forward for consistency.

<groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>

http://docs.codehaus.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=8003

Maczka Michal wrote:

>This is a question related to m1 but I prefer to ask it here:
>
>
>Are there any reasons why we should not to use things like in m1?
>
><dependency>
>   <groupId>atlas/styx2</groupId>
>   <artifactId>styx2-documents</artifactId>
>   <version>1.0.2</version>
></dependency>
>
>Note that groupId is containing a path which has 2 segments (we can have
>more of them).
>
>
>Is this how it is going to look in m2?
>
>I made the very first experiments with m1 and it seems that this is already
>supported (I am not 100% sure)!!
>
>
>Michal
>
>
>  
>


Mime
View raw message