maven-m2-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject cvs commit: maven-components/maven-core/src/site/apt/lifecycle lifecycle-phases.apt
Date Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:54:12 GMT
brett       2005/02/12 19:54:12

  Modified:    maven-core/src/site/apt/lifecycle lifecycle-phases.apt
  add notes relating to alternate lifecycles (eg for site)
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.4       +22 -1     maven-components/maven-core/src/site/apt/lifecycle/lifecycle-phases.apt
  Index: lifecycle-phases.apt
  RCS file: /home/cvs/maven-components/maven-core/src/site/apt/lifecycle/lifecycle-phases.apt,v
  retrieving revision 1.3
  retrieving revision 1.4
  diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
  --- lifecycle-phases.apt	12 Feb 2005 17:36:42 -0000	1.3
  +++ lifecycle-phases.apt	13 Feb 2005 03:54:12 -0000	1.4
  @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
    * compile [plexus component or something else]
  - * process classes
  + * process classes [eg JDO, coverage]
    * generate test sources [generating junit tests]
  @@ -216,3 +216,24 @@
       direction, but when you factor inheritance into the mix, this could get 
       really sticky.
   [/Added, jdcasey/2005-01-23]
  +[Added, brett/2005-02-13: Inserting these as things left over from previous 
  +mails to m2-dev that were pre-lifecycle]
  +Multiple lifecycles will be able to be used and defined - for example "site"
  +would have an additional lifecycle. This interface may even be available to
  +users, though strongly discouraged as the default lifecycles should accommodate
  +almost any use case.
  +As the site runs through, it will want to ensure that parts of the lifecycle
  +already complete are not run again unless the parameters change.
  +eg. For coverage - no need to compile again, but do add an additional
  +instrumentation step, then run the tests again on the new instrumented classes 
  +(in a new directory, not over the top of the old ones).
  +To simplify this, we may actually allow some steps to re-run and rely on the
  +file timestamping to make it effecient.
  +[/Added, brett/2005-02-13]

View raw message