Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81AB200D59 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 09:53:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id AD936160C09; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 08:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id F2566160C00 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 09:53:09 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 24156 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2017 08:53:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@maven.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 24145 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2017 08:53:09 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 08:53:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D3A7DC3025 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 08:53:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.211 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YZROX0qIX6IF for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 08:53:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id ED6BC5F296 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 08:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3D4BBE0662 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 08:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id EA0AF212FB for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 08:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 08:53:00 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?Q?Herv=C3=A9_Boutemy_=28JIRA=29?= To: issues@maven.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Comment Edited] (MNG-6308) display packaging when building a module MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 08:53:10 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6308?page=3Dcom.atlassian.j= ira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D162851= 44#comment-16285144 ]=20 Herv=C3=A9 Boutemy edited comment on MNG-6308 at 12/10/17 8:52 AM: -------------------------------------------------------------- re-reading once more http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.5.2/maven-core/artifact-= handlers.html I don't think having a packaging attribute on artifact handlers has really = a meaning: javadoc packaging does not exist, not java-source I really feel that there is a misconception here (and I suppose that this g= etPackaging() method isn't used anywhere since it does not really have any = meaning) and when we read the documentation for type in pom's dependency http://mave= n.apache.org/ref/3.5.2/maven-model/maven.html#class_dependency , this misco= nception is apparent by the vague explanations was (Author: hboutemy): re-reading once more http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.5.2/maven-core/artifact-= handlers.html I don't think having a packaging attribute on artifact handlers has really = a meaning: javadoc packaging does not exist, not java-source I really feel that there is a misconception here (and I suppose that this g= etPackaging() method isn't used anywhere since it does not really have any = meaning) > display packaging when building a module > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: MNG-6308 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6308 > Project: Maven > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 3.5.2 > Reporter: Herv=C3=A9 Boutemy > Assignee: Herv=C3=A9 Boutemy > > Packaging is a key information, since it defines what bindings will be: i= t is short and should be visible in the build log > proposal: > {code}[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------= ------------ > [INFO] Building Apache Maven Distribution 3.5.3-SNAPSHOT [= 15/15] > [INFO] --------------------------------------------------------------- p= om --{code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)