maven-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "SebbASF (JIRA)" <j...@codehaus.org>
Subject [jira] (MNGSITE-180) State more clearly that the maven-foo-plugin naming pattern is really reserved and can be a trademark infringement
Date Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:16:03 GMT

    [ https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGSITE-180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=327044#comment-327044
] 

SebbASF commented on MNGSITE-180:
---------------------------------

+1, but I think it could be stronger; I would replace

<<strongly discouraged>> with <<not allowed>>
                
> State more clearly that the maven-foo-plugin naming pattern is really reserved and can
be a trademark infringement
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNGSITE-180
>                 URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGSITE-180
>             Project: Maven Project Web Site
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Baptiste Mathus
>         Attachments: MNGSITE-180.patch
>
>
> Hi,
> As a followup to that thread of maven-users: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Maven-plugin-trademarks-Re-Downloading-a-file-for-shipping-in-an-artifact-tt5759104.html
> I'm attaching a possible patch to improve the current plugin documentation so that people
don't name their plugin maven-something-plugin without knowing this is a very very bad idea.
> Cheers

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message