Mailing-List: contact issues-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@maven.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: 
 <10632248.118591244135022227.JavaMail.haus-jira@codehaus01.managed.contegix.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:03:42 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Tuomas Kiviaho (JIRA)" <jira@codehaus.org>
To: issues@maven.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (MASSEMBLY-421) Maven repository
 layout like directory structure using dependencySet
In-Reply-To: 
 <6467595.116321244119362066.JavaMail.haus-jira@codehaus01.managed.contegix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=179346#action_179346 ] 

Tuomas Kiviaho edited comment on MASSEMBLY-421 at 6/4/09 12:02 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the pointer. Shame on me since it was properly documented as well. Works like a charm with dependency:build-classpath.

      was (Author: tuomas_kiviaho):
    Thanks for the pointer. Shame on me since it was properly documented as well. Works like a charm with dependency:build-process.
  
> Maven repository layout like directory structure using dependencySet
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MASSEMBLY-421
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-421
>             Project: Maven 2.x Assembly Plugin
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Tuomas Kiviaho
>            Assignee: John Casey
>             Fix For: 2.2-beta-4
>
>
> I can't figure out a decent way how to produce maven repo layout with outputFileNameMapping (and outputDirectory). I can produce legacy layout but default seems to be currently impossible using ${artifact.groupId}.  I hope there is easier way of using some intermediate property that "${artifact.}" or "${artifact.handler.}" provides, but I could not find one.
> Therefore I propose a new parameter 'layout' with 'default' and 'legacy' values to control appearance of ${artifact.groupId}.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira