maven-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Arik Kfir (JIRA)" <j...@codehaus.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SCM-195) Wrong SCM info put by the release plugin for modules
Date Fri, 12 May 2006 10:19:40 GMT
    [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-195?page=comments#action_65273 ] 

Arik Kfir commented on SCM-195:
-------------------------------

emmanuel: when the release plugin writes the modified pom back into svn (with the released
version, etc), it also writes a wrong scm url (under the <scm> tag). The url that's
written is the one of the parent pom, without the module's name appended to the "/trunk" -
*even though* it was properly specified there before the release...

when the child pom has no <scm> tag, it works well.

> Wrong SCM info put by the release plugin for modules
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: SCM-195
>          URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-195
>      Project: Maven SCM
>         Type: Bug

>     Versions: 1.0-beta-3
>  Environment: Sun JDK 1.5, M2 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT (2006-01-30), Subversion SCM
>     Reporter: Arik Kfir
>      Fix For: 1.0

>
>
> Hi,
> I have a project with several modules in it. The entire project is
> stored in one SVN repository, in the following layout:
> myproject
>   |
>   +-- module A
>   |
>   +-- module B
>   |
>   +-- .....
> The root pom has a <scm> url like "http://svn.myserver/.../trunk/", and each sub
module also has its own <scm> tag with a url such as "http://svn.myserver/.../trunk/moduleA",
etc.
> When running "release:prepare", the URL encoded back into the modules' POMs (the back-to-trunk
pom, not the released one) is the same URL as the root POM, rather than the original module's
SCM url. So module A's <scm> urls would be "http://svn.myserver/.../trunk/" without
the "moduleA" directory appended to it (as it was before releasing).
> Carlos has pointed out to me that the best practice for this use case is not specifying
the <scm> tag for the modules' POMs at all. He did, however, also noted that it's still
a bug - hence this JIRA ;-)
> Cheers.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message