maven-doxia-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Doxia Versioning (WAS Preparation of Doxia 1.0-beta-1 release)
Date Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:08:09 GMT
I have a question about this...

Does this mean that MNG-3402 should be rescheduled for 2.1.0 now,  
instead of 2.0.11?

I have updated the wiki - and have pushed the upgrade to beta-1 out to  
2.1.0-M3 so that we can push out another milestone in the mean time.

Cheers,
Brett

2008/12/16 Vincent Siveton <vincent.siveton@gmail.com>
Hi Dennis,

I renamed branches, did an external on the branches, updated some poms.
I leave you Jira and the 1.0 release.

Cheers,

Vincent

2008/12/14 Vincent Siveton <vincent.siveton@gmail.com>:
 > Hi Dennis,
 >
 >> 2. Rename
 >> http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-sitetools-1.0-alpha-x/
 >> to
 >> http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-sitetools-1.0.x/
 >
 > I didn't remember this branch... Thanks to refresh my memory :)
 >
 > So, I suggest also to create an external on these branches. I  
propose:
 > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/1.0-x with
 > doxia           https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia/branches/doxia-1.0.x/
 > doxia-sitetools https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/branches/doxia-1.0.x/
 >
 > Also, think to update the scm tag in the poms :)
 >
 >>> - apply new versioning in pom
 >>
 >> Yes, either before the release or during release:prepare, for both  
the
 >> branch and trunk.
 >
 > Before is better IMHO
 >
 >>> What else?
 >>
 >> For the 1.0 release I think that covers it.
 >>
 >> Shall we divide up the work between us Vincent?
 >> If I do the 1.0 release can you do the 1.1 release?
 >
 > Sounds good for me.
 >
 > Cheers,
 >
 > Vincent
 >



-- 
Brett Porter
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message