maven-doxia-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vincent Siveton" <vincent.sive...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Releasing Doxia
Date Thu, 23 Aug 2007 01:13:59 GMT
2007/8/22, Dennis Lundberg <dennisl@apache.org>:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
> >
> > On 21 Aug 07, at 6:05 PM 21 Aug 07, Brett Porter wrote:
> >
> >> To date, I have always been in favour of one trunk, and one version.
> >>
> >> I understand the need for a clear separate and for Doxia to be useful
> >> without the site tools, but I don't think separating the releases was
> >> the right way to do it.
> >>
> >
> > I use them completely separately. I barely touch the site generation
> > stuff in my integration. The site tools are completely layered upon the
> > core. If they are going to be clear and separate then they are released
> > separately and have separate trunks. I think people who currently work
> > on them have never used them for anything other then the site plugin.
> > It's also not hard to create another JIRA project.
> >
> > I don't particularly care if people want to glob them back together but
> > they are functionally separate. I can use the core without the site
> > tools, one is clearly and extension of the other. In this alpha state
> > changes in the site tools require changes in the core but that should
> > not be the case for very long.
>
> I don't have a need to bring them back together again. They are separate
> if you look at their respective use cases. What I would like to do, for
> this release at least, is to align the version numbering. That way we
> can release the code that we have now, and all the 49 closed issues in
> JIRA with "fix for" 1.0-alpha-9 will be correct, version-wise.
>
> In short: we release doxia:doxia:1.0-alpha-9 and
> doxia:doxia-sitetools:1.0-alpha-9, separately but simultaneously.
>
> After the releases we can create a new JIRA project for doxia-sitetools
> and move sitetools issues there from DOXIA. And let each project have
> their own versions.

+1 for your proposal.

Cheers,

Vincent

> >
> >> - Brett
> >>
> >> On 22/08/2007, at 6:07 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> >>
> >>> Creating a separate thread for release questions...
> >>>
> >>> Do we have two releases in reality? On one hand we have doxia:doxia
> >>> (currently slated for alpha-9) and on the other we have
> >>> doxia:doxia-sitetools (currently slated for 1.0). Is everybody OK
> >>> with those versions?
> >>>
> >>> I am not. Having two different versions for these two will totally
> >>> mess up JIRA. Therefor I'd like to use 1.0-alpha-9 for both, this
> >>> time. If we want separate releases for them in the future, then we
> >>> need two separate projects for doxia and doxia-sitetools in JIRA.
> >>>
> >>> In order for the maven-site-plugin to be able to use the new
> >>> doxia:doxia we need to release doxia:doxia-sitetools.
> >>>
> >>> Are there any other questions regarding the release?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Dennis Lundberg
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > Jason van Zyl
> > Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
> > jason at sonatype dot com
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Dennis Lundberg
>

Mime
View raw message