maven-doxia-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vincent Siveton" <vincent.sive...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Releasing Doxia
Date Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:24:01 GMT
Hi,

I agree with Dennis and Brett's comments. I also prefer one version of
doxia, with a parent pom. But if we want to go with two projects, we
need two jira projects.

Cheers,

Vincent

2007/8/21, Jason van Zyl <jason@maven.org>:
>
> On 21 Aug 07, at 6:05 PM 21 Aug 07, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> > To date, I have always been in favour of one trunk, and one version.
> >
> > I understand the need for a clear separate and for Doxia to be
> > useful without the site tools, but I don't think separating the
> > releases was the right way to do it.
> >
>
> I use them completely separately. I barely touch the site generation
> stuff in my integration. The site tools are completely layered upon
> the core. If they are going to be clear and separate then they are
> released separately and have separate trunks. I think people who
> currently work on them have never used them for anything other then
> the site plugin. It's also not hard to create another JIRA project.
>
> I don't particularly care if people want to glob them back together
> but they are functionally separate. I can use the core without the
> site tools, one is clearly and extension of the other. In this alpha
> state changes in the site tools require changes in the core but that
> should not be the case for very long.
>
> > - Brett
> >
> > On 22/08/2007, at 6:07 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> >
> >> Creating a separate thread for release questions...
> >>
> >> Do we have two releases in reality? On one hand we have
> >> doxia:doxia (currently slated for alpha-9) and on the other we
> >> have doxia:doxia-sitetools (currently slated for 1.0). Is
> >> everybody OK with those versions?
> >>
> >> I am not. Having two different versions for these two will totally
> >> mess up JIRA. Therefor I'd like to use 1.0-alpha-9 for both, this
> >> time. If we want separate releases for them in the future, then we
> >> need two separate projects for doxia and doxia-sitetools in JIRA.
> >>
> >> In order for the maven-site-plugin to be able to use the new
> >> doxia:doxia we need to release doxia:doxia-sitetools.
> >>
> >> Are there any other questions regarding the release?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dennis Lundberg
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Jason van Zyl
> Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
> jason at sonatype dot com
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message