maven-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Build vs Consumer POM study
Date Tue, 13 Mar 2018 21:47:50 GMT
Am 2018-03-13 um 18:23 schrieb Robert Scholte:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:13:59 +0100, Hervé BOUTEMY 
> <herve.boutemy@free.fr> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Charles,
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback
>>
>> Le lundi 12 mars 2018, 01:49:26 CET Charles Honton a écrit :
>>> Hervé,
>>>
>>> Great work!
>> Thank you: it took a lot of time and discussion :)
>>
>>> Some possible additions for the wiki page:
>>>
>>> Naming Conventions
>>> consumer pom must continue to be named pom.xml
>>> build pom shall be called build.xml
>>> alternate build inputs could be build.json or build.yaml
>> ok, makes sense, I reworked it and added to the proposal
> 
> Well, I think renaming would cause IDE issues (it's claimed for Ant 
> projects), and this file still represents the Project Object Model, 
> hence pom still makes sense.
> I expect more issues than benefits, and everywhere is documented: a 
> Maven project requires a pom.xml

I fully agree, build.xml is already taken. Let's stick to pom.xml or at 
least to pom-consumer.xml.

Michael


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org


Mime
View raw message