maven-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Charles Honton <c...@honton.org>
Subject Re: Reactor safe/rally points
Date Tue, 07 Nov 2017 01:31:50 GMT
Are these integration test for the plugin or do the integration tests use the plugin?  If the
former, then the invoker plugin is appropriate.  If the latter, then a non-code, non-transitive
dependency scope is a possibility.  Again, this new scope has the backwards compatibility
problem..

> On Nov 5, 2017, at 11:30 PM, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com>
wrote:
> 
> Yes it would, but socially people don’t do that... and anyway, there are
> legitimate use cases, eg tomee has (or had if they gave up fighting and
> moved it out of reactor) a plugin that was tied to the container version.
> To allow integration tests in the same reactor as the main codebase, it is
> reasonable to want the plugin built at the same time.


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message