Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD28200C50 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 01:36:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 0A53A160B96; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 00:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 5116D160B93 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 01:36:12 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 99154 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2017 00:36:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Maven Developers List" Reply-To: "Maven Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 99143 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2017 00:36:11 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 00:36:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BD180C18D3 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 00:36:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.003 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.003 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nR0aN7z_XUow for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 00:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vps.schulte.it (vps.schulte.it [176.28.31.178]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3661C5FB64 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 00:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t60.schulte.it (p5DE9153B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.233.21.59]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps.schulte.it (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id v2P0a2rD001632 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 01:36:03 +0100 Subject: Re: What to do with the 6 issues left as 3.5.0-candidates? Reply-To: Maven Developers List References: <3dafd354-45ef-05f5-0b3c-676152a49001@schulte.it> To: Maven Developers List From: Christian Schulte Message-ID: <80c9290f-4242-7d83-f6ff-655ad3e6052b@schulte.it> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 01:36:02 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; OpenBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (vps.schulte.it [176.28.31.178]); Sat, 25 Mar 2017 01:36:03 +0100 (CET) archived-at: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 00:36:13 -0000 Am 03/25/17 um 01:30 schrieb Christian Schulte: > Am 03/24/17 um 23:28 schrieb Stephen Connolly: >> Keep in mind that AIUI we aim to be BourneShell compatible in which case $( >> ) is not available > > Thanks for pointing this out. Our launchers have this in the first line: > > #!/bin/sh > > /bin/sh should be a POSIX compatible shell. On the BSDs, OSX and Solaris > (IIRC) this is some kind of ksh. The man page on OpenBSD explicitly > states this: > > This version of sh is actually ksh in disguise. As such, it also > supports the features described in ksh(1). This manual page describes > only the parts relevant to a POSIX compliant sh. If portability is a > concern, use only those features described in this page. > > They provide different man pages for sh and ksh although /bin/sh is ksh. > > http://man.openbsd.org/sh > http://man.openbsd.org/ksh > > Can you provide a link to some BourneShell man page (a real one, not > bash)? We should fix the launchers in 3.5.0 once and for all. > > Currently reading the "Shell & Utilities" volume from here: > > > > This is what we should be compatible to. Did not find anything about > "readlink" in there so we should not be using it and find a compliant > solution. > > Regards, > Seems we really should be using "`pwd -P`" as you suggested. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org