Mailing-List: contact dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Maven Developers List" <dev@maven.apache.org>
Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy)
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Herv=E9?= BOUTEMY <herve.boutemy@free.fr>
To: Maven Developers List <dev@maven.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Releases, Continuous Delivery and the Future
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 11:42:07 +0100
Message-ID: <1967496.LrcM0ela0Q@herve-desktop>
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-43-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: 
 <CANWgJS7M6dOLaNW6=w8WxH+chEbSzLqvBPK__eDHtmXzSUWDAQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <40648A1E-17AD-4825-BA6A-B1954B75DC05@takari.io>
 <9C8CD1E6-CFFF-4F6B-8B80-701263616288@infinity.nu>
 <CANWgJS7M6dOLaNW6=w8WxH+chEbSzLqvBPK__eDHtmXzSUWDAQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Le vendredi 2 janvier 2015 10:31:52 Baptiste Mathus a =E9crit :
> Well, I for one find the x.y.z-nn somehow unusual. I'd prefer somethi=
ng
> simple like x.y.z and I don't give a f*ck if some numbers are skipped=
.
>=20
> +1 with Stephen: I've never seen someone complain about missing versi=
ons
> neither on ML nor IRL. Sure, I suppose people might wonder where the =
4.x
> went if the next mvn version was to be 5.0, but apart (and even thoug=
h)
> from the major version, I don't see any developer ever complaining ab=
out
> that.
>=20
> Just then let's indeed have a changelog somewhere just for reference =
that
> confirms that the x.y.foo was skipped and never released.
see http://maven.apache.org/docs/history.html
the fact that a version was never released is not explictely written, b=
ut=20
since this is the official history...


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org