Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-112694-apmail-maven-dev-archive=maven.apache.org@maven.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-maven-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-maven-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96F539655
	for <apmail-maven-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:06:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 53987 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2014 10:06:07 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-maven-dev-archive@maven.apache.org
Received: (qmail 53907 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2014 10:06:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@maven.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@maven.apache.org>
List-Id: "Maven Developers List" <dev.maven.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Maven Developers List" <dev@maven.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@maven.apache.org
Received: (qmail 53882 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2014 10:06:05 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:06:05 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.218.53 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.218.53] (HELO mail-oi0-f53.google.com) (209.85.218.53)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:05:39 +0000
Received: by mail-oi0-f53.google.com with SMTP id x69so7809800oia.40
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 02:04:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=uqujmbAWuGNZQmDOcd35jvWh7ne1i4A6QwNk2nIWszk=;
        b=Ovvef7a+SVjrRVtSzfnleMcz6Ges3YkZaGGDgAUCYIFJraJimOBqfIFvPiR1WuWIuD
         FqP1Jy6pXg5B/bQpqeZGoRVJQOUskKzwe3DttK14f80GDkmb6hMQUd7St2YgQvJpnou5
         AM9YxteiPcUoxnNaB++54tBP5+PM4kCovi78rJ0qwfeLGCsoTcaZ3qrzuIM0+qsZzxQh
         05JZBQ3SQvtMUrvrVmx/1ejXuwVn6xgjcOWvIN/+BBl9DVbNflgl7b69Bu9lq2eizy9j
         jojktIfJ57C+dQ+YItmPcCwIvjv4RRJ0fxQE411M7xmwr+Jg26WuRB+CQSGBCixovuIc
         1AyQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.68.104 with SMTP id v8mr17866132obt.17.1418637847944;
 Mon, 15 Dec 2014 02:04:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.5.134 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 02:04:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+nPnMyKXor9kSibcnD-O4ckdindLObYON2JgS7EGO3m9vUDJQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+nPnMyKXor9kSibcnD-O4ckdindLObYON2JgS7EGO3m9vUDJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:04:07 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CA+nPnMx1D7w_idL4inyTbUAKaeQCusg20=1-NBM4NmOg+SE3AA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Run-off for mascot's name
From: Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com>
To: Maven Users List <users@maven.apache.org>,
 Maven Developers List <dev@maven.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb20204fde355050a3e5ca6
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--e89a8fb20204fde355050a3e5ca6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

This poll is now closed. I will now proceed to count the votes.... and
votes received after this mail is sent will be excluded from the final count

On 9 December 2014 at 10:52, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is a run-off vote to select the top two options for our new mascot's
> name.
>
> The entries with the highest number of votes will be selected for the
> final round. If there is only one entry with the highest number of votes
> then the entries with the second highest number of votes will also be
> included in the final round.
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> The entries are as follows:
>
> A. Abraham
> B. Boo
> C. Darth Mowl
> D. Jacob
> E. Kaboom
> F. Moses
> G. Rap
> H. Shotgun
> K. The Maven Owl
> L. Ty
>
> It is not clear whether all of the above suggestions were completely
> serious, but I have included them anyway for this first round.
>
> Please respond with at most your top three in order of preference. I may
> not use second or third preferences if we get a sufficient number of votes,
> but in the case of a small poll the additional preferences will help.
>
> In the event of repeated votes from an individual, only the last cast vote
> as determined by me will count.
>
> Any other discussion should happen in a separate thread.
>
> Thanks
>
> -Stephen
>

--e89a8fb20204fde355050a3e5ca6--