Mailing-List: contact dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Maven Developers List" <dev@maven.apache.org>
Message-ID: <547630B7.9090308@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 20:57:43 +0100
From: Michael Osipov <michaelo@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Maven Developers List <dev@maven.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Ticket Transition Workflow: Abandoned issues
References: 
 <CABLGb9xc4aij_VsPiTZMjnArANX_EqPnwz0uT1ZSwSTYAPz2=g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABLGb9xc4aij_VsPiTZMjnArANX_EqPnwz0uT1ZSwSTYAPz2=g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Am 2014-11-26 um 16:16 schrieb Paul Benedict:
> This email is related to thread "Abandoned bug analysis" [1].
>
> We have done the Great Ticket Cleanup of 2014 twice this year. It has
> really been productive for anyone who triages outstanding bugs and
> enhancements. We've been adding a note in the ticket, as a courtesy to the
> participants, and closing them as "Won't Fix".
>
> This is certainly one valid way of accomplishing the goal. However, I do
> believe we should enhance our workflow by adding an "Abandoned" (my fav) or
> "Archived" resolution. Why? Because "Won't Fix" is typically is used to
> close out a bug that will never be fixed (i.e., too many people rely on the
> bad behavior) or the enhancement is deemed worthless or incorrect. But more
> importantly, it's not possible to do a JIRA search and distinguish between
> these two conditions unless a new resolution is introduced.

We need two new things:

1. Status: Awaiting Feedback (not just labels).
2. Resolution: Archived

Michael

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org