maven-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kristian Rosenvold <kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM 1.9 (take 2)
Date Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:12:52 GMT
I usually ignore threads when they degenerate into procedural discussions
and I'll guarantee supress any voting thread where the first thing that
comes out is a -1; I've got coding to do.

Sorry for being an idiot, I'm usually quite good at keeping my foot out of
my mouth. Can't always get it right.

Kristian





2013/12/20 Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com>

> On Thursday, 19 December 2013, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
> > I think all the crap/trolling in the release threads has gone way too
> far,
> > it's just not fun any more.
> >
> > I can only request that PMC members chip in *before* the the vote to
> > /improve/ technical problems with a release
> > rather than spending a ton of energy documenting their -1 *after* the
> > release is staged.
>
>
> I did my testing, I found an issue which, in good conscience I feel means I
> cannot vote +1. I stated my vote was not a veto and I would not stand in
> the way of a release. This only needed one more +1 from a PMC member... I
> don't see that as trolling... Where was your vote?
>
>
> >
> > Kristian
> >
> >
> > 2013/12/19 Robert Scholte <rfscholte@apache.org>
> >
> > > Stephens remarks are valid, let me try to pick this up in the next
> couple
> > > of weeks.
> > >
> > > Robert
> > >
> > > Op Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:31:13 +0100 schreef Dominik Bartholdi <
> > > domi@fortysix.ch>:
> > >
> > >
> > >  Thanks Oliver,
> > >> its a bit disappointing, as this at the end (at least for me) also
> means
> > >> the other scm components are not maintainable anymore…
> > >> Taking this into account, then its probably a better idea to not have
> > >> this under the apache umbrella anyway.
> > >> Where do you think we should release it from? Or should I just make a
> > >> release with my own gav and publish it via Sonatype?
> > >> regards Domi
> > >>
> > >> On 16.12.2013, at 00:15, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>  So that's 2 weeks now.
> > >>> I presume I can say the vote failed.
> > >>> I will delete the tag and the staging repo.
> > >>> If someone else want to act RM let's go. perso I'm tired....
> > >>>
> > >>> @Domi I'm sorry I believed if was a good idea to have the module jgit
> > >>> here (but cvs looks to me more important :P ).
> > >>> Anyway we can release that separately somewhere else.
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>>
> > >>> Olivier
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 5 December 2013 04:24, Dominik Bartholdi <domi@fortysix.ch>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> OK, then you have my +1
> > >>>> /Domi
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 03.12.2013, at 08:20, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  No worries.
> > >>>>> IMHO it's not the problem. Issue is cvs-commons module.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Olivier
> > >>>>> On Dec 3, 2013 3:34 PM, "Dominik Bartholdi" <domi@fortysix.ch>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>  Sorry guys, during the week I’m usually a bit short in time…
> > >>>>>> But is ist possible, that my commit
> > >>>>>> d1f102e5223e5fe0f852e1a5becb497f0e860d6a is actually causing
this
> > >>>>>> issue?
> > >>>>>> Its an exclude of some CVS stuff I had in my untracked
list all
> the
> > >>>>>> time
> > >>>>>> when doing a full build...
> > >>>>>> regards Domi
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 03.12.2013, at 02:57, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>  On 3 December 2013 12:52, Bernd Eckenfels <
> ecki@zusammenkunft.net>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Am 03.12.2013, 02:47 Uhr, schrieb Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org
> >:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>  For some reasons I don't understand yet why
> defaultExclude=false
> > >>>>>>>>> doesn't work for CVS directories.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Uh, isnt that supposed to be "yes" to enable the
exclusion of
> > >>>>>>>> default
> > >>>>>>>> patterns?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> no because in this case we want some cvs directories
included in
> > the
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> assembly.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> That's why we need to use defaultExclude=false to prevent
some
> > >>>>>>> default
> > >>>>>>> pattern exclusion (or I really understand nothing :-))
> > >>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from my phone
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message