Mailing-List: contact dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Maven Developers List" <dev@maven.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dennisl.apache@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.160.42 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: dennisl.apache@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <62477505-F680-4CEB-B242-1746A6D4AE48@tesla.io>
References: <62477505-F680-4CEB-B242-1746A6D4AE48@tesla.io>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:45:46 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CA+BhkyP29UfsU8qJR4AYQ6rYncK-+a2pV5X-7kp6LBvOjFZNGA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Maven Core ITs and releasable state
From: Dennis Lundberg <dennisl@apache.org>
To: Maven Developers List <dev@maven.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54306bcb6195504e4621ce7

--bcaec54306bcb6195504e4621ce7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Thanks for looking into this Jason.

As someone who has tried to fix these builds, I think what we need is a
platform independent way to set up and run the core ITs. The best choice is
probably to use Ant.
Den 20 aug 2013 16:18 skrev "Jason van Zyl" <jason@tesla.io>:

> I have separated them like the following to delineate the stable builds
> that are a reliable measure of the ITs working and things that have either
> been failing for months, or things we can't reasonably maintain.
>
> If these are working I consider Maven releasable:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven%20Core%20ITs/
>
> I put the rest of them here:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven%20Core%20ITs%20(unstable)/
>
> If the jobs in the first group are passing can we consider that being in a
> reasonable state for a release?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Jason van Zyl
> Founder,  Apache Maven
> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--bcaec54306bcb6195504e4621ce7--