Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-maven-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-maven-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C82C7F368 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 13:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16599 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2013 13:57:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-dev-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 16484 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2013 13:57:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Maven Developers List" Reply-To: "Maven Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 16476 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2013 13:57:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 13:57:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.177] (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 13:57:16 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ey16so2166062wid.10 for ; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 06:56:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=1pq2rXq7OnEYxkiepcRrhNoN90s+DODO1iEun1kd2os=; b=voPkYPb/ucyg4S+MKzWzh5aapeagS1/XppRxGkacJQRNhSy3qxJlZZ7Wz1IQZ1KQbz 3QkVzBve9LugVptzB9kLQuSmaGavZqbJ9zIsTHS/wqsShmoqbMB3hUqbU2bA30Rr1YDG eVBsH9oM3p2PBhZJFL+k/fAU2iEjxmahaS6IhWJOlNQqQ2DZLFmyZm9JuMjnAULIsHPq /aoZW4c70fEsl3oUcq0gde30Vx7oEy699BlLz/+O5MkFEp3Mly84SZ1rOeOfWJdC1jRD Qgpnu1ma8QrceJQ21qwm1tXmvP6WiE146e3qOFQ9zE7SwhL0/GEglO7nM0305soHtrli Asug== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.90.240 with SMTP id bz16mr5889905wib.24.1373032616541; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 06:56:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.152.103 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 06:56:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 14:56:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven War plugin 2.4 From: sebb To: Maven Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 5 July 2013 14:46, Stephen Connolly wrote: > On 5 July 2013 14:43, Stephen Connolly wrote: > >> On 5 July 2013 14:32, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 5 July 2013 12:48, Olivier Lamy wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > I'd like to release Apache Maven War Plugin 2.4. >>> > >>> > We fixed 10 issue >>> > >>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=18840&styleName=Text&projectId=11150 >>> > >>> > Staging repository: >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-105 >>> > >>> > Source release: >>> > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-105/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-war-plugin/2.4/maven-war-plugin-2.4-source-release.zip >>> > >>> > Staged web site: >>> > http://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-war-plugin-LATEST/ >>> > >>> > Vote open for 72H >>> > [+1] >>> > [0] >>> > [-1] X >>> >>> There are about 40 test files without AL headers. At least some of >>> them can and should have headers. >>> >> >> And as we already discussed we have put in place a process to track >> conformance in this regard. >> >> We will be reporting the total of violations to the board and we will be >> turning the screws to bring this total down. >> >> At this point I do not view "test data/resources" as blocking on a release. >> >> If you can point to a non-binary file outside of src/it, >> src/test/resources, or other similar folders that is missing a license >> header *and* >> > that file was present in the previous release then I agree that it should >> be addressed before release. >> > > Should read before send. > > If a file was in a previous release and it is a test resource then the > header situation will be addressed by the process the PMC has put in place > > If a file is not a test resource, then it needs the header for a release... > irrespective of whether the file was present in the previous release or not. > > If a file is a *new* test resource, then it needs the header for a release > *or* clear justification that the presence of the header would invalidate > the test... we are trying to make things better not worse. Agreed, but how are the new files to be identified? If the release contains any header violations, one way to identify which files are new would be to include the SVN tag of the previous release in the release vote. > -Stephen > > >> >> Similarly, new plugins or maven release roots should be clean before their >> first release. >> >> But in those cases where we have a legacy issue of missing license headers >> in test resources, this PMC has put a process in place to address the issue >> and until the board advises differently, test resources will be addressed >> by that process >> >> -Stephen >> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Olivier Lamy >>> > Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au >>> > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org