maven-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1500602 - /maven/archetype/trunk/pom.xml
Date Mon, 08 Jul 2013 08:46:15 GMT
On 8 July 2013 09:26,  <aheritier@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: aheritier
> Date: Mon Jul  8 08:26:19 2013
> New Revision: 1500602
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1500602
> Log:
> Revert commons-io upgrade. commons-io >= 2.3 requires Java6 or later while we are
always supporting Java 5

-1

The commit makes two other unrelated changes, so is not actually a revert.

>
> Modified:
>     maven/archetype/trunk/pom.xml
>
> Modified: maven/archetype/trunk/pom.xml
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/archetype/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1500602&r1=1500601&r2=1500602&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- maven/archetype/trunk/pom.xml (original)
> +++ maven/archetype/trunk/pom.xml Mon Jul  8 08:26:19 2013
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ under the License.
>      <mavenVersion>2.0.8</mavenVersion><!-- with 2.0.9 proxy test fails-->
>      <netbeans.hint.useExternalMaven>true</netbeans.hint.useExternalMaven>
>      <mavenPluginPluginVersion>3.2</mavenPluginPluginVersion>
> -    <wagonVersion>1.0</wagonVersion>
> +    <wagonVersion>2.4</wagonVersion>

Was this change intended?

If so, should be in the SVN log message so commit reviewers know if it
was accidental or not.

>      <maven.site.path>archetype-archives/archetype-LATEST</maven.site.path>
>    </properties>
>
> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ under the License.
>        <dependency>
>          <groupId>commons-io</groupId>
>          <artifactId>commons-io</artifactId>
> -        <version>2.4</version>
> +        <version>2.2</version>
>        </dependency>
>        <dependency>
>          <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
> @@ -318,6 +318,8 @@ under the License.
>              <exclude>src/test/**</exclude>
>              <exclude>src/it/**</exclude>
>              <exclude>.repository/**</exclude><!-- for CI -->
> +            <!-- Used by JEnv -->
> +            <exclude>.java-version</exclude>

Was this change intended?

If so, should be in the SVN log message so commit reviewers know if it
was accidental or not.

>            </excludes>
>          </configuration>
>          <executions>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org


Mime
View raw message