+1 (non-binding)


On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Baptiste MATHUS <ml@batmat.net> wrote:

> +1, bump to JDK6 minimum for Maven.
>
>
> 2013/2/6 Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com>
>
> > I think we should at least have a minor version bump on core to
> > co-incide... Though I think calling it maven 4.0 might be better (that
> way
> > we catch up with the model version ;-)
> >
> > On Wednesday, 6 February 2013, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > As we are now in 2013, it's probably time to think about that (again).
> > >
> > > Reading [1], even 1.6 won't be anymore updated after feb 2013.
> > >
> > > Can we say we are safe to go to 1.6 as minimum required ?
> > >
> > > NOTE: That will probably need a vote. So depending on how the thread
> > > move, I will start a vote (or not).
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > --
> > > Olivier Lamy
> > > Talend: http://coders.talend.com
> > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> > >
> > > [1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org<javascript:;>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
> > Sauvez un arbre,
> > Mangez un castor ! nbsp;!
>



-- 
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory