maven-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io>
Subject Re: Logging
Date Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:51:01 GMT
I'll get it up on our Jenkins but here's a run that shows it passes:

http://ci.tesla.io:8080/job/maven-its-logback/jdk=jdk-1.6/20/

On Dec 17, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 17 December 2012 17:28, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> 2012/12/17 Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com>:
>>> Now the above could be fixed... but *somebody* needs to write some code
>> to
>>> make them fixed. In the absence of anyone writing such code and
>> committing
>>> it, those branches are dead... as are those choices.
>>> 
>>> IF YOU WANT TO SPONSOR ONE OF THOSE BRANCHES THEN WRITE THE DAMN CODE TO
>>> GET THEM WALKING AGAIN
>>> 
>>> That leaves logback and log4j2 on the table...
>>> 
>>> JvZ has said that logback passes the ITs
>>> I have asked quite pointedly that Olivier (or anyone who is advocating
>> for
>>> log4j2) would run the ITs and provide confirmation that log4j2 passes the
>>> ITs.
>> branch logging/slf4j-log4j2 pass it (at least locally) and with this
>> jenkins job
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.6-log4j2/
> 
> 
> Thank you. I will take that as PASSES (confirmed)... I assume JvZ will now
> rush to demonstrate Mr Jenkins passing for his branch so he can move up
> from PASSES (unconfirmed) ;-)
> 
> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> I would expect the "other" side in either choice, or an independent third
>>> party (such as Mr Jenkins if he can be made to get the integration tests
>> to
>>> pass at all) to provide confirmation that their "opposition" either has a
>>> branch that passes the integration tests or a claim that they are needing
>>> to give better proof.
>>> 
>>> Now into that maelstrom Benson struck with his $0.02... arguing against
>>> log4j2 (for now) which kind of leaves us with logback (unless one of the
>>> other branches is brought back from the dead by somebody writing some
>>> code...)
>> My 0.02 euros.
>> Perso I use log4j2 for months without any issue.
>> And performance are good. Even here with Maven ! (See various reports
>> from folks on the other thread)
>> I read http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/performance.html (agree
>> benchmarks depends on various factors (and could be maybe different if
>> runed somewhere else) but that's something to take care.
>> Then Log4j2 is a community developpement effort and have a good
>> license for our Maven.
>> 
> 
> These kinds of things are the things we should be debating... so far I have
> not seen much debate... But I have been waiting to get some options through
> the technical gates first before trying to stir up any non-technical
> debates.
> 
> 
>> 
>>> 
>> 

Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder & CTO, Sonatype
Founder,  Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
---------------------------------------------------------

happiness is like a butterfly: the more you chase it, the more it will
elude you, but if you turn your attention to other things, it will come
and sit softly on your shoulder ...

-- Thoreau 






Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message