Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-maven-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-maven-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11427D41B for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 22:07:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86008 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2012 22:07:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-dev-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 85930 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2012 22:07:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Maven Developers List" Reply-To: "Maven Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 85920 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2012 22:07:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 22:07:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.43] (HELO mail-da0-f43.google.com) (209.85.210.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 22:07:48 +0000 Received: by mail-da0-f43.google.com with SMTP id u36so4974913dak.30 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 14:07:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=kxks+9mxSNAnstn9bSz8beaLF2r61zcvIMI96xru1bo=; b=Vwbv012ZbsGmBvIOQkiBK7O58PL/bR2xAG/Csn7qPGUmUOvWFl1vuLFHe5qmDzBJyH LKG7g6UgkHT7any/7P4dQs1A6AtVraUTNMqq2y5t6OcZG1EVC9iZ1iq9zVbzIPV75RsG YZCvWBQ8UXQfxrWV5Tjl8GmCkQQpads3UztSXJQMAAmGH5CG704favjbHMwUGwDNm7vj jNMYxLFl2p/7v9D7t+iilLWf0DR4v0HHdPjjoWbyM/ChzHtl9CXgMM5QU4F041fbmsbx RSrtGcXmzXMySIXAU5msCXepP2mv88oDGOg081QJ3XBS+cxeNmeg6amki7DPAnt+n8SI aT8g== Received: by 10.68.189.233 with SMTP id gl9mr31512894pbc.166.1353881246339; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 14:07:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.0.10] (ppp121-44-241-188.lns20.syd7.internode.on.net. [121.44.241.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t1sm7554040paw.11.2012.11.25.14.07.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 25 Nov 2012 14:07:25 -0800 (PST) Sender: Brett Porter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: To RC or not RC From: Brett Porter In-Reply-To: <5ED3D96C-8BF2-4406-A8EE-BE77961C9AD1@tesla.io> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:07:21 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <07A4B2CE-9862-4F62-A504-AE988FCB545E@apache.org> References: <5ED3D96C-8BF2-4406-A8EE-BE77961C9AD1@tesla.io> To: "Maven Developers List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmH6qshRXXS6+3phlJLIEXIV1mquY0SdH/UGhftvjU2b/A59kWyXmJuMef4TcxUkDy6A6pY X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 26/11/2012, at 6:42 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > I wish RCs were useful, but I don't believe anyone really looks or = takes the time to even try anything until it's actually released. 3.0.4 had 5 RCs from memory, and so far, 3.1.0 has had one pulled back - = seems like they are being useful? I don't mind naming them all 3.1.0 and having the RM delete the tag, but = we should keep enough time/repeats in there to find issues - we don't = want another "don't use 2.2.0, it's broken" type scenario. - Brett -- Brett Porter brett@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter http://twitter.com/brettporter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org