maven-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Maven Core to Git
Date Mon, 26 Nov 2012 19:44:54 GMT
Kristian, can you ping me on irc tomorrow and maybe I can put some time
into sorting the issues out (from the Jenkins side)

On Monday, 26 November 2012, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:

> > There is also
> > https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15367
> > which went into Jenkins 1.492 that was released yesterday, that may or
> > may not be a factor in this depending who you talk to.
>
> Additionally, there is
> https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-6604 which was fixed in
> remoting
> 4 days ago. According to the issue text it renders the slaves
> "unusable". To which extent that makes the
> remote poller crash out is also unknown. But it's "known" that we have
> a *lot* of 6604 on the nodes,
> especially right after a restart. I am unsure what effect a single
> "bad apple" among the remote nodes
> has and to what extent we would detect it.
>
>
> Reading the jenkins code makes me quite sure that any build that is locked
> to
> 1 specific node will not encounter any of the network-down issues. I
> don't really understand
> how to get "assignedNode"
> (
> https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/blob/master/core/src/main/java/hudson/model/AbstractProject.java#L354
> )
> to be non-null but that should stop the random reallocations. I assume we
> could
> lock a few of the jobs down to given nodes and keep some open while we
> continue to track the problem ?
>
> >
> > Apart from these issues I proposed that we release a couple of our own
> > products using git, before we move the core over to git. Just so that we
> > have a good grasp of how a Maven release using git is done and get it
> > properly documented. I'm not up to date on the progress here though.
> > Would those of you that have done such releases please let us know?
>
> I believe all wagon, surefire and scm have all been released from git,
> so I think we're in the clear on /that/ particular aspect.
>
> Personally I think we should go ahead and convert core too.
>
>
> Kristian
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message