Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-maven-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79662 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 17:29:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 17:29:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 2614 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:29:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-dev-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 2550 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:29:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Maven Developers List" Reply-To: "Maven Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 2515 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 17:29:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:29:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [129.217.128.51] (HELO unimail.uni-dortmund.de) (129.217.128.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:29:37 +0000 Received: from [192.168.178.11] (i53874803.versanet.de [83.135.72.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by unimail.uni-dortmund.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p24HTFVX002096 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 18:29:16 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4D71216E.6000902@udo.edu> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:29:18 +0100 From: Benjamin Bentmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: '*.java ident' considered harmful References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Jesse Glick wrote: > Is this line in .gitattributes for Maven 3 sources really necessary? This configuration exists to keep Git and SVN in sync about file modifications. > Wouldn't it be better to just delete $Id$ from those SVN sources where it appears? As long as somebody else provides the patch, that's fine with me, I don't have a strong feeling for those keyword expansions. Not sure how others feel about them. Benjamin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org