maven-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr>
Subject Re: MSITE-560
Date Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:58:02 GMT
it works!!!

the bad news is that a new Maven 2.2.x release is necessary.
And I still have to tweak a little bit for deploy tasks: I didn't really try 
for the moment.

But the actual MSITE-560 branch works both with Maven 3 and latest 2.2.2-RC1-
SNAPSHOT.

Regards

Hervé

Le samedi 12 mars 2011, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
>  in my wildest dreams, there was a unique plugin version without any
> particular Maven version-specific configuration when using it: all the
> magic would be at compile time, since Maven core artifacts are used
> 
> for the moment, the only feature causing problems is deploying: since
> maven- deploy-plugin doesn't have such compatibility issues, I suppose
> there is a way to have code compatible with both Maven 2 & 3, no? I need
> to investigate.
> 
> But yes, if the dream cannot happen, we'll have to create a compatibility
> layer, and users will have to continue the ${basedir} profile hack
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hervé
> 
> Le vendredi 11 mars 2011, Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
> > On 2011-03-02 01:34, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I tried to have a unique maven-site-plugin version compatible with both
> > > Maven 2 and 3.
> > > I think I updated the code to be compatible.
> > > But I have a problem: there are classloading issues when run with Maven
> > > 2, since Maven 3 specific libraries are picked. I tried to add these
> > > libraries into a profile, without success.
> > > 
> > > Can somebody have a look and help, please?
> > 
> > This idea has been on my mind for a while as well. Thanks for putting
> > some code in there so that we can test and discuss!
> > 
> > After fiddling with the MSITE-560 branch a bit I see two major concerns.
> > The changes I made on the branch was to change mavenVersion to 2.2.1 and
> > adding a few dependencies that are used in the trunk of Site Plugin.
> > 
> > 1. maven-artifact[-manager]
> > 
> > These are not available in M3, but the real question is: can M3 use the
> > M2 versions of these to resolve artifacts?
> > 
> > 2. maven-setting (encryption)
> > 
> > I got as far as getting these errors using the M2 version as a
> > dependency: package org.apache.maven.settings.crypto does not exist
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Another idea that I had was to split out all the Maven-version specific
> > functionality into a compatibility layer, outside the Site plugin. Kind
> > of what you have started with the reporting-exec module. Here's how I
> > envision it:
> > 
> > maven-site-compatibility:2.0.0
> > - includes all M2 specific code and dependencies
> > 
> > maven-site-compatibility:3.0.0
> > - includes all M3 specific code and dependencies
> > 
> > maven-site-plugin
> > - includes all the rest
> > - depends on maven-site-compatibility:2.0.0
> > 
> > If you want to run the Site Plugin with M3 you would add a dependency on
> > maven-site-compatibility:3.0.0 to your Site Plugin declaration.
> > 
> > > Thanks
> > > 
> > > Hervé
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org


Mime
View raw message